Why Are the Eigenvalues of This Matrix A and A + φ²B?

Gianfelici
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a problem with the calculation of the eigenvalue of a matrix. That matrix is an N x N matrix which can be written as:

##M^{ab} = A\delta^{ab} + B \phi^a \phi^b##

where ##\delta^{ab}## is the identity matrix and the ##\phi## is a column vector. The paper I'm studying says that the eigenvalue of this matrix are:

A with molteplicity 1

##A + \phi^2 B## with molteplicity N-1

but I can't understand why! Can anyone help me?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You should put ## around the latex code to render it :smile:
 
adjacent said:
You should put ## around the latex code to render it :smile:


Thank you, now it'right
 
Gianfelici said:
The paper I'm studying says that the eigenvalue of this matrix are:

A with molteplicity 1

##A + \phi^2 B## with molteplicity N-1

I think it should be
A with multiplicity N-1
##A + \phi^2 B## with multiplicity 1.

First find the eigenvalues of the rank 1 matrix ##B\phi^a\phi^b##.
Then think about what happens when you add ##A\delta^{ab}##, which is A times the identity matrix.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
yes, you're right, it was A with multeplicity N-1 and the other with multeplicity 1. I tried to use your suggestion and I solved it! thank you very much!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top