Why are the trivial zeros negative even integers?

beyond
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
\varsigma(s) = \sum^{\infty}_{n=1}n^{-s}

If you substitute a trivial zero, let's say -2. Wouldn't it be

\varsigma(s) = \sum^{\infty}_{n=1} = 1^2 + 2^2 + 3^2 + 4^2 + . . .

How would this series be equals to zero?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So that means that the Riemann Hypothesis is based on the functional equation instead?
 
& the bernoulli numbers, and the function \xi
 
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...

Similar threads

Back
Top