Why aren't interference filters also polarizers?

AI Thread Summary
Interference filters are not significant polarizers because they primarily function as polychromatic filters, varying with viewing angles. While dichroic filters can exhibit different efficiencies based on the polarization of incoming light, their polarizing effect is much weaker compared to dedicated polarizers. The angle at which light strikes these filters also plays a role in limiting polarization. Filters can be engineered to maintain high pass efficiencies for both s- and p-polarizations, further reducing their ability to polarize light. Overall, interference filters do not achieve substantial polarization effects.
Neo_Anderson
Messages
171
Reaction score
1
After all, the un-passed light reflects off a transparent medium with a definite index of refraction, right?
HELP!
 
Science news on Phys.org
I think the only reason that you don't get significant polarisation is that the light strikes a polarising filter very near the Normal.
 
...Well, I did get one answer...

Interference filters are poly chromatic, depending on viewing angle. Polychromatic, but not polarizing in any significant way.

Anyone else?
 
The filters I use (dichroics) have different efficiencies depending on the polarization of the incident light (s- or p- polarization), so I expect they can indeed polarize the incident light somewhat. The polarizing efficiency of the dichroic filter is much lower than a polarizer, tho.

It's possible to design filters to have very high pass efficiencies for both the s- and p- states, so they would not induce any large amount of polarization.
 
Back
Top