Why can wire mesh reflect radio waves for telescope dishes?

AI Thread Summary
Radio telescope dishes can be constructed from wire mesh because the mesh's hole size must be less than 1/10 of the radio wave's wavelength for effective reflection. This phenomenon occurs as electromagnetic waves induce currents on the surface of a perfect conductor, which then generate secondary waves that cancel the incident wave inside the conductor. The induced currents on a large sheet of conductor align with the wave's polarization, allowing for the replacement of solid sheets with insulated wires running in the same direction. Additionally, by using wires oriented in both the x and y directions, the system can effectively reflect any linearly polarized wave. Gaps in the wire mesh can still provide good reflection as long as they remain subwavelength in size, maintaining the integrity of the reflected wave.
aster79
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I’ve heard that the reason radio telescope dishes can be made out of wire mesh is because, so long as the size of the holes is less than (I believe) 1/10 the wavelength of the radio wave, the wave be reflected (it will see the dish as being solid). I was wondering what the physical reason was that this should be true, as I haven’t seemed to have found an adequate answer for this anywhere.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Any solid sheet of conductor will reflect a radio wave. This is done because electromagnetic waves induce currents on the surface of a perfect conductor. These currents will generate their own electromagnetic waves. The secondary waves will cancel out the incident wave inside the PEC (thus there are no waves inside the PEC) and will represent the scattered wave outside of the PEC. In the case of a large flat surface this scattered wave will be a nice reflection of the incident wave.

If we look at the results for a plane wave, we know that a plane wave is generated by an infinite sheet of current that runs along the direction of polarization for a linearly polarized wave. Via reciprocity, we know that if this wave struck an infinite PEC sheet that the induced currents would be the same as the source currents and would run in the direction of the electric field's polarization. This means that the induced currents on a very large sheet that is illuminated over a small section of the sheet will approximately flow along one direction. Thus, we can cut strips in this sheet so that we now have a bunch of wires that run along the direction of the incident wave's polarization. Since the induced current will flow largely along, say, the x direction, if were we replace our solid sheet with insulated wires that run in the x direction then we can achieve the same reflection of the wave since the induced currents can be the same. This only works along the polarization of the wave. But, for linear polarization we can decompose any arbitrarily linearly polarized wave into the summation of two orthogonally linearly polarized waves. Thus, if we run another set of wires orthogonally to our first set (say now in the x and y directions) then the induced currents from the decomposed wave (which we now decompose into x and y polarized waves) can run the lengths of the wires without being impeded. So this is why we can replace the solid sheet with lengths of wires running crosswise. Finally, we can extend this to any kind of incident signal since we can decompose any electromagnetic wave into a superposition of plane waves.

Now if we allow gaps between the wires, we find that we can still achieve very good reflection if the gaps are on the order of subwavelength in size. This is because the resulting currents can still approximate a good representation of the reflected wave. This is similar to how we can sample an audio signal at 10 KHz and be able to reproduce perfectly any signal with frequency of 5 KHz or less.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the post; it helped to clear things up for me. :)
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
Hello ! As we know by definition that: "Constructive interference occurs when the phase difference between the waves is an even multiple of π (180°), whereas destructive interference occurs when the difference is an odd multiple of π." But my question is in the case of destructive interference, what happens to the energy carried by the two electromagnetic waves that annihilate, the energy carried by the electromagnetic waves also disappears, or is transformed into some other type of...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top