Why can't electron be stationary ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Docscientist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of the energy of an electron in a stationary state as described by Bohr's model of the hydrogen atom. The model is based on four fundamental principles: electrons occupy stable orbits, each associated with a specific energy level; light is emitted or absorbed when electrons transition between these orbits; and the energy and frequency of emitted or absorbed light correspond to the difference in energy between the orbits. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the foundational assumptions of the Bohr model, highlighting that it is a theoretical construct rather than a definitive representation of reality. The discussion also raises questions about the validity of the model, suggesting that while it provides a formula for calculating electron energy, it may not fully capture the complexities of atomic behavior.
Docscientist
Messages
101
Reaction score
11
What do we mean when we say the energy of electron in stationary state is given by an equation from bohr's model of hydrogen atom ?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Docscientist said:
What do we mean when we say the energy of electron in stationary state

ask /see the fundamental assumptions of Bohr'model- then try to understand it- as a model is a model only -not a 'real thing".(and it may not be true)
Suppose you build a model of a bridge- then initial assumptions become important.

For your info see following:
The four principles of Bohr:

1, Electrons can stay only in certain orbits which are stable and called "stationary" orbits.

2. Each stationary" orbits.has an energy associated with it. e.g the orbit cl.sest to the nucleus has an energy E1, the next closest E2 and so on.

3. Light is emitted when an electron jumps from a higher orbit to a lower orbit and absorbed when it jumps from a lower to higher orbit.

4.The energy and frequency of light emitted or absorbed is related by the difference between the two orbit energies, e.g., initial and final orbits
E(light) = Ef - Ei and the frequency of light n is n = E(light)/hwhere h= Planck's constant = 6.627x10-34 Js and where "f" and "i" represent final and initial orbits.

now try to understand the assumptions.
 
That there exist a formula that we plug n into, and out jumps a value which describes nth electron energy?
 
  • Like
Likes Docscientist and drvrm
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
Back
Top