Why Can't We Significantly Boost ICE Auto Efficiency?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PRDan4th
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Auto Efficiency
AI Thread Summary
Improving the efficiency of internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles can be achieved through heat recovery systems and regenerative braking. Heat recovery can utilize lost radiator heat to generate additional torque or electricity, while regenerative braking can convert braking energy into electricity. These methods may be particularly beneficial in hybrid vehicles, where electricity plays a larger role in fuel consumption. Various companies are already implementing these strategies to enhance efficiency. Ongoing innovations in hybrid vehicle technology continue to explore these concepts for better fuel economy.
PRDan4th
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Why can't we improve the efficiency (miles/gallon) of ICE autos?

It seems to me there are two areas that can be used to add efficiency:

1) Heat recovery with some form of a "bottoming cycle" to generate additional torque or electricity from heat lost in the radiator, and

2) Breaking energy - generating electricity from engaging an alternator when the brake pedal is used, or maybe when the driver takes his foot of the gas. A lot of energy is wasted in breaking.

These may be more important in hybrid vehicles where electricity is being used in a greater proportion of the fuel mix.

Has anyone here looked at this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
PRDan4th said:
Why can't we improve the efficiency (miles/gallon) of ICE autos?

It seems to me there are two areas that can be used to add efficiency:

1) Heat recovery with some form of a "bottoming cycle" to generate additional torque or electricity from heat lost in the radiator, and

2) Breaking energy - generating electricity from engaging an alternator when the brake pedal is used, or maybe when the driver takes his foot of the gas. A lot of energy is wasted in breaking.

These may be more important in hybrid vehicles where electricity is being used in a greater proportion of the fuel mix.

Has anyone here looked at this?

These are all good ideas. And they are already being implemented by various companies around the world. You might want to check the https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=232274" for even more ideas.

I'm working on a gas, steam, electric, pneumatic, hydraulic, spring, and flywheel hybrid vehicle. With pedals as an option of course.:smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top