I Why combination and permutation is useless in physics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relevance of combinations and permutations in physics, questioning their necessity in undergraduate courses that primarily focus on algebra, complex numbers, and calculus. Participants argue that while these mathematical concepts may not be emphasized in basic physics education, they are not entirely useless, as they play a role in advanced topics like statistical mechanics and the Gibbs paradox. The need for permutations in differential forms, which are applicable in various physics contexts, is highlighted. Ultimately, the conversation suggests that while discrete math may not be foundational, it still holds value in specific areas of physics. The debate reflects the complexity of integrating different mathematical disciplines into physics education.
tze liu
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
discuss whether combination and permutation in math are useless in physics
the undergraduate math courses related to physics always contain algebra,complex number and calculus.

however we don't need to study discrete math /combination and permutation in those courses

that means those stuffs are useless in physics ?if so, why they are useless in physics?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Stat mech and the Gibbs paradox.
 
  • Like
Likes mfb
You need permutations for differential forms, which are used in physics.
 
tze liu said:
discuss whether combination and permutation in math are useless in physics
the undergraduate math courses related to physics always contain algebra,complex number and calculus.

however we don't need to study discrete math /combination and permutation in those courses

that means those stuffs are useless in physics ?if so, why they are useless in physics?
Is this for a schoolwork/homework question?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top