Why did the bike rotate in the physics experiment in the film 187?

AI Thread Summary
In the film One Eight Seven, the bicycle's rotation causes the chair to spin due to the conservation of angular momentum. When the bike wheel is spun horizontally, it acquires angular momentum, which necessitates an equal and opposite reaction from the chair to maintain the system's total angular momentum at zero. The chair does not rotate when the bike is vertical because the angular momentum is not effectively transferred in that position. The force causing the chair to rotate comes from the interaction of the spinning wheel with the chair, creating a torque that results in the chair's movement. This demonstration illustrates fundamental physics principles, particularly the conservation of angular momentum.
sharpnova
Messages
43
Reaction score
1
In the beginning scene of the film One Eight Seven, Samuel Jackson's character has one of his students hold a bicycle while sitting in a chair, and pump the pedals until the wheel got up to around 180 rpm.

When he told the student to tilt the bike to the right, the chair started rotating.

Why? I can't think of any legitimate physics reason why this would happen.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is due to conservation of angular momentum.
If he sits down on the chair with the wheel not spinning, the total angular momentum of the system is zero.
If he then starts spinning the wheel when it is horizontal, he gives the wheel angular momentum, and so the chair must spin in the opposite direction to balance the angular momentum and keep the total angular momentum of the system at zero.

(you can't create a net angular momentum out of nothing, just like you can't create a net momentum out of nothing)
 
I understand that it happens due to conservation of angular momentum, but I have two questions about it:

1. why doesn't the chair rotate when the bike is held vertical and its wheel is spun. Doesn't the wheel have angular momentum in this state as well?

2. aside from the conservation principle at work, what actual force is causing the chair to rotate. where is it coming from? what is the force explanation for this demonstration of conservation of angular momentum?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top