Why Do Bubbles Form in Methyl Methacrylate Reaction at High Temperatures?

Thread starter mirandasatterley
Start date Sep 29, 2007
Tags

polymerization Radical

AI Thread Summary

Bubbles form in the methyl methacrylate reaction at high temperatures due to the decomposition of dibenzoyl peroxide, which releases gas as it breaks down. The heating process accelerates the reaction rate, leading to increased gas evolution. This phenomenon is typical in reactions involving peroxides, as they can produce volatile byproducts when heated. Understanding the thermal stability of peroxides is crucial for predicting gas release during the reaction. Proper management of reaction conditions is essential to control bubble formation and ensure a successful polymerization process.

Sep 29, 2007

mirandasatterley

Homework Statement

When heating the methyl methacrylate reaction (methyl methacrylate and dibenzoyl peroxide) to 90-95oC, why do bubbles evolve from the solution?

Homework Equations

None

The Attempt at a Solution

I'm not sure why the bubbles form. Any hints or helpful websites?

Physics news on Phys.org

Oct 1, 2007

chemisttree

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

What happens when you heat a peroxide?

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...

View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

View full post »