Why do cars get deformed in high-speed crashes?

AI Thread Summary
In high-speed crashes, the deformation of cars is primarily influenced by the momentum of the vehicle, which is the product of its speed and mass, and the strength of the object it collides with, such as a steel beam. While the density and strength of the steel play a significant role, the speed of the car also contributes to the extent of deformation. At high speeds, a car can experience severe structural failure, leading to significant damage rather than bouncing back. A 15-inch thick steel beam would likely result in catastrophic damage to the car, potentially cutting it in half. Overall, both the speed of the vehicle and the strength of the object are critical factors in determining the outcome of such collisions.
Alacritous
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a question. Let's say a car is moving at 100 miles an hour and hits a 15 inch thick steel beam, the car would most likely go flying back and get deformed (assuming the beam is being held into place somehow, like being bolted into the ground or something). Based on my understanding of Newton's 3rd law of motion (which is limited), I thought that this was because of the density and strength of the steel, and not because of the speed of the moving object. Someone in another forum said I am wrong and that if the car was moving fast enough, it would penetrate the steel (he used the world trade center as an example which seems to prove me wrong). Could someone explain this to me?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, if it were moving fast enough, it would knock the pole over. It does depend on the car's momentum (product of speed and mass) and the steel beam's strength. The faster the collision, the more BOTH objects will be deformed.

EDIT: However, a 15-inch thick steel beam would probably just cut the car in half.
 
Also, since most of the energy is absorbed through plastic deformation or structural failure, cars in accidents don't tend to bounce back very far.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top