Why Do EMF Meters Measure ELF/VLF Differently?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Curiousphy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emf Measure Rf
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the differences in measurement units used by EMF meters for Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) and Very Low Frequency (VLF) electromagnetic fields compared to Radio Frequency (RF) fields. Participants explore the implications of these differences in terms of power density and flux density, as well as the physical characteristics of the waves involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why EMF meters measure ELF and VLF in flux density units while RF is measured in power density units, suggesting that it may relate to the differing power densities of these frequencies.
  • Another participant speculates that the distinction might be due to the near field versus far field effects, noting that at VLF and below, one is always in the near field region.
  • A different viewpoint raises the concept of radiation resistance and its potential impact on measurements, particularly at lower frequencies where man-made conductors may have low radiation resistance.
  • One participant emphasizes the inefficiency of the human body as an antenna for ELF and VLF waves, suggesting that this inefficiency leads to minimal power coupling and heating effects compared to exposure to strong electric fields.
  • Reference is made to the significant voltages and currents required for transmitting antennas at low frequencies, indicating that the body may be more at risk from electric fields than from radiation intensity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various hypotheses regarding the measurement differences, but no consensus is reached. Multiple competing views remain regarding the underlying reasons for the distinctions in measurement units.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the topic, including factors like near field versus far field effects, radiation resistance, and the physical characteristics of the human body in relation to electromagnetic fields. The discussion does not resolve these complexities.

Curiousphy
Messages
41
Reaction score
4
Why do EMF meters measure ELF and VLF in flux density units but RF in power density units? Is it because ELF/VLF have low power density and high flux density, and RF has high power density and low flux density? They are all EM waves, right? what's driving the difference in measurement units? thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't know anything about EMF meters, but I'd hazard a guess at the reason for discriminating between EM waves at VLF (and below) versus those at substantially higher frequencies (you don't specify a region for these.)
My first thought was near field and far field, as you are always in the near field region at VLF and below. But at what most people call RF, say MF and above, you are still going to be within the near field for much of the time.
So, not knowing your context, I wonder whether it is to do with radiation resistance? In common situations any energised man-made conductor is going to be a very small fraction of a wavelength at VLF and below and have a tiny radiation resistance. So unless the currents are very large, there is very little radiation. On the other hand there can be a detectable magnetic field close to the conductor.
Why or how people measure RF power density, I don't know.
 
Merlin3189 said:
So, not knowing your context, I wonder whether it is to do with radiation resistance?
Or perhaps to do with the fact that the impedance will not be free space. The units could perhaps be E field or H field, depending. If it's to do with the actual interference power onto a signal the significance would be a bit specific. Very different from free space interference into an antenna.
 
Curiousphy said:
Why do EMF meters measure ELF and VLF in flux density units but RF in power density units? Is it because ELF/VLF have low power density and high flux density, and RF has high power density and low flux density? They are all EM waves, right? what's driving the difference in measurement units? thanks
The body is only about 2m long, so it is a very inefficient antenna for the long waves associated with ELF and VLF. Therefore it couples very little power out of a passing wave, and the heating effect is small. On the other hand, the body might be exposed to very large electric fields, for instance in the case of a rigger working on a transmitting antenna. Such fields can produce dielectric heating of the body. Very strong magnetic fields are also subject to recommended limits, as adverse effects are thought to occur.
The transmitting antennas for long waves require huge voltages and currents in order to radiate significant power, so the body is more at risk from these fields than from the radiation intensity. As a matter of interest, we have in the UK a national LF broadcast transmitter radiating 500 kW at 198kHz.
The international recommendations from ICNIRP are published at the following URL:
http://www.icnirp.org/cms/upload/publications/ICNIRPemfgdl.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
10K