Why Do EMF Meters Measure ELF/VLF Differently?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Curiousphy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Emf Measure Rf
Curiousphy
Messages
41
Reaction score
4
Why do EMF meters measure ELF and VLF in flux density units but RF in power density units? Is it because ELF/VLF have low power density and high flux density, and RF has high power density and low flux density? They are all EM waves, right? what's driving the difference in measurement units? thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't know anything about EMF meters, but I'd hazard a guess at the reason for discriminating between EM waves at VLF (and below) versus those at substantially higher frequencies (you don't specify a region for these.)
My first thought was near field and far field, as you are always in the near field region at VLF and below. But at what most people call RF, say MF and above, you are still going to be within the near field for much of the time.
So, not knowing your context, I wonder whether it is to do with radiation resistance? In common situations any energised man-made conductor is going to be a very small fraction of a wavelength at VLF and below and have a tiny radiation resistance. So unless the currents are very large, there is very little radiation. On the other hand there can be a detectable magnetic field close to the conductor.
Why or how people measure RF power density, I don't know.
 
Merlin3189 said:
So, not knowing your context, I wonder whether it is to do with radiation resistance?
Or perhaps to do with the fact that the impedance will not be free space. The units could perhaps be E field or H field, depending. If it's to do with the actual interference power onto a signal the significance would be a bit specific. Very different from free space interference into an antenna.
 
Curiousphy said:
Why do EMF meters measure ELF and VLF in flux density units but RF in power density units? Is it because ELF/VLF have low power density and high flux density, and RF has high power density and low flux density? They are all EM waves, right? what's driving the difference in measurement units? thanks
The body is only about 2m long, so it is a very inefficient antenna for the long waves associated with ELF and VLF. Therefore it couples very little power out of a passing wave, and the heating effect is small. On the other hand, the body might be exposed to very large electric fields, for instance in the case of a rigger working on a transmitting antenna. Such fields can produce dielectric heating of the body. Very strong magnetic fields are also subject to recommended limits, as adverse effects are thought to occur.
The transmitting antennas for long waves require huge voltages and currents in order to radiate significant power, so the body is more at risk from these fields than from the radiation intensity. As a matter of interest, we have in the UK a national LF broadcast transmitter radiating 500 kW at 198kHz.
The international recommendations from ICNIRP are published at the following URL:
http://www.icnirp.org/cms/upload/publications/ICNIRPemfgdl.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
10K