Why Do Gravitational Waves Occur?

Mistake Not...
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I know GWs are produced by moving masses, but I can't find an explanation as to why it happens.

A system would lose energy to gravitational radiation. Does the radiation get produced spontaneously, or would it be because the mass has to move through space-time which holds it back somewhat (this is the only reason I can think of that would make it lose energy)?

My question might be slightly confusing, but in essence: Why is gravitational radiation produced?

Thanks
Geoff
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mistake Not... said:
Why is gravitational radiation produced?

The physical answer to the question would be: "Because this is what happens when masses accelerate according to Einstein's field equations."

You may go further and ask "Why do Einstein's field equations look as they do?", but that is a philosophical question rather than a physical one.

Compare to the generation of electromagnetic radiation, it is produced based on the acceleration of charges and this is described by Maxwell's equations. There is no underlying "why", it is simply how Maxwell's equations work.
 
  • Like
Likes Mistake Not...
The Einstein equations tells you that the Einstein Tensor (G_{\mu \nu}) is proportional to the energy-momentum tensor T_{\mu \nu}:
G_{\mu \nu} \equiv R_{\mu \nu} - \frac{1}{2} g_{\mu \nu} \mathcal{R} = \alpha T_{\mu \nu}

If now you are in a large distance from a static matter distribution you will live in a metric g_{\mu \nu}
However if there are some changes in the matter distribution (that is in the T_{\mu \nu}) then your metric is also going to be changed to g':
g_{\mu \nu}^\prime = g_{\mu \nu} + h_{\mu \nu}
With h playing the role of a perturbation due to matter distribution changes.
Now if you input that metric g', in the Einstein equations (and making some assumptions like that h is small), you are going to reach the result that h sattisfies a wave equation.
 
  • Like
Likes Mistake Not...
ChrisVer said:
Now if you input that metric g', in the Einstein equations (and making some assumptions like that h is small), you are going to reach the result that h sattisfies a wave equation.
It should be pointed out that this wave equation has a source term which will be dependent on the changes in the matter distribution, just as there will be a source term in the electromagnetic wave equation which depends on the changes in the charge distribution.
 
  • Like
Likes Mistake Not...
Mistake Not... said:
Why is gravitational radiation produced?
As Orodruin suggested, you should try to understand why accelerated charges produce EM waves. It's basically because changes in the EM-field propagate at a finite speed. There are many resources on this, for example:
http://www.tapir.caltech.edu/~teviet/Waves/empulse.html

Changes in gravitational fields also propagate at a finite speed, so you have a similar effect.
 
  • Like
Likes Mistake Not...
Mistake Not... said:
I know GWs are produced by moving masses, but I can't find an explanation as to why it happens.

Gravitational waves are not just produced because a mass is moving. You need a mass that is accelerating (and the acceleration has to be at a varying rate).

Mistake Not... said:
A system would lose energy to gravitational radiation. Does the radiation get produced spontaneously, or would it be because the mass has to move through space-time which holds it back somewhat (this is the only reason I can think of that would make it lose energy)?

Objects don't move through spacetime. Objects move through space.

It doesn't make sense to imagine a physical effect arising because an object is moving through space. Motion is relative, so a frame of reference always exists in which the object is at rest (at a given moment in time).

Mistake Not... said:
My question might be slightly confusing, but in essence: Why is gravitational radiation produced?

Your "why" question could be interpreted as asking (1) for a logical explanation of why such an effect must occur, or (2) for an underlying physical mechanism. As others have pointed out, we don't know of any answer to #2. Re #1, here's a simple argument. Special relativity says that information can't propagate at speeds greater than c. General relativity is a different deal, but roughly speaking we would expect the same restriction to apply. If I could wiggle the Earth and *instantaneously* produce a gravitational effect on the moon, I'd be propagating information at a speed greater than c. Therefore there must be a time lag for gravitational effects to propagate, which must mean that the effects propagate as waves.
 
  • Like
Likes Mistake Not...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top