Why do horsepower and torque curves crossover around 5252 rpm's?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hxtasy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Automotive
AI Thread Summary
Horsepower and torque curves typically crossover around 5252 RPM due to the mathematical relationship between the two, expressed as hp = (tq x rpm)/5252. This crossover point occurs because horsepower is derived from torque, making it a constant in English units. However, the curves may not intersect exactly at this point in practice, and tuning an engine cannot change the fundamental crossover location. The crossover point varies when using different measurement units, such as kilowatts and Newton meters. Understanding this relationship is crucial for interpreting dyno graphs accurately.
hxtasy
Messages
112
Reaction score
1
This is more of an automotive question I guess but anyways:

I'm pretty familar with how torque and horsepower are related, the common equation most people think of is hp = ((tq X rpm)/ 5252).

If you look at a lot of dyno graphs, the hp and torque curves always crossover around 5252. Obviously this is because they are equal around 5,252 rpm's. What i don't get is that they do not cross exactly at this point, and another thing I've heard is that some people will tune engines so that they do cross at this point. What is the advantage of this?

here are some example dyno sheets/graphs:

http://www.electricsupercharger.com/images/dyno/DYNO-PORSCHE_84_911_STOCK.jpg

http://dynos.evans-tuning.com/750whpsc300featurecar.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, since the horsepower is a calculation based on the torque output, the lines always cross at 5252 rpm. Any graph that shows otherwise is incorrect. You cannot "tune the engine" to change the location of the crossing point.
 
Although the lines cross, the units are not the same. Also the lines only cross at 33000/(2 pi) = 5252.113... when using English units. Using kilowatts and Newton meters, the lines cross at 60,000 / (2 pi) = 9549.296...

Wiki link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torque
 
Here are the equations:
Torque measured in Newton meters. (USE MKS units)

Power (watts) = torque x 2 pi (RPM/60) = torque x RPM/9.549

Power (HP) = watts/746 = torque x RPM/(746 x 9.549) = torque x RPM/7124
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top