Why Do Larger Atomic Nuclei Require More Neutrons?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nathan17
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Larger atomic nuclei require more neutrons to maintain stability due to the balance between the attractive nuclear force and the repulsive electrostatic force among protons. As the atomic number increases, the number of protons rises, leading to greater electrostatic repulsion. Neutrons help mitigate this repulsion by adding attractive forces that increase spacing between protons. This neutron-to-proton ratio is crucial for achieving a stable nucleus. Understanding the charge and mass number values of particles like electrons, positrons, neutrinos, and gamma rays is foundational to these concepts.
nathan17
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Radioactivity Justification

1. The problem statements, all variables and given/known data
1a. Justify the appropriate charge and mass number values for an electron, a positron, a neutrino and an antineutrino.

1b. Justify the appropriate charge and mass number values for a gamma ray.

1c. Using the properties of the attractive nuclear force and the repulsive electrostatic force between protons, discuss the reason for the increase in the neutron-to-proton ratio of stable nuclei as the atomic number increase.

Homework Equations


N.A

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not really sure on how to go about these questions, I am currently on school holidays and the end of year exams keep getting closer and closer so I really want to try get as much work as possible done to ensure that I get a pass in my subjects.

For the first two I think that I am supposed to justify using the laws of conservation (energy, momentum, nucleons, charge (?)) but I don't know how.

For the third question, I'm not sure, but is this correct:
When the mass of the nucleus increases the number of protons increase. Due to this increase, the electrostatic repulsive force increases, this force is long ranged. The addition of neutrons provide an attractive force to increase the spacing between protons, which reduces the average repulsive force per proton

If anyone could shed some light onto this for me, I would greatly appreciate it!

I appologise if I have posted in the wrong section, but seeing how this relates somewhat to coursework (The curriculum statement questions) I figured this would be the best place.

Thankyou,
Nathan
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
.Answer:1a. Electron: Charge = -1, Mass number = 0; Positron: Charge = +1, Mass number = 0; Neutrino: Charge = 0, Mass number = 0; Antineutrino: Charge = 0, Mass number = 0. These values are determined by the conservation laws of energy, momentum and charge. 1b. Gamma Ray: Charge = 0, Mass number = 0. Gamma rays have no charge and no mass, as they are composed of pure energy and are not particles. 1c. As the atomic number increases, the ratio of neutrons to protons in a nucleus must increase in order to balance the attractive nuclear force and the repulsive electrostatic force between protons. This is necessary in order to achieve a stable nucleus. The addition of neutrons provides an attractive force, which increases the spacing between protons, and thus reduces the average repulsive force per proton.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top