Why Do Monochromatic Light Fringes Have Better Contrast Than White Light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tonauac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analytical Proof
AI Thread Summary
Monochromatic light produces interference fringes with better visibility and contrast compared to white light due to the absence of overlapping wavelengths. The discussion emphasizes the need for a mathematical proof to quantify this contrast difference, defined as the intensity difference between adjacent maxima and minima. For white light, integrating the intensity across the visible spectrum can help establish the intensity versus position relationship. The conversation highlights the importance of defining "better contrast" to facilitate a clearer understanding of the phenomenon. Overall, monochromatic light is favored for clearer interference patterns.
Tonauac
Analytical proof for
better Visibility and contrast of interference fringes created by monochromatic light than white light.

I know that there will be overlapping & ...the light fades on moving to extrmities...in case of white light...and there wil be a better contrast ...incase of monochromatic light...but i need a mathematical proof...,
pls reply...urgently required.........
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you define better contrast? If you don't have a definition, then you have to come up with one. A simple definition would be the difference between the intensities of adjacent maxima and minima.

For white light, if you don't already have the intensity vs position relationship, you should be able to integrate over the visible spectrum to find intensity as a function of position.
 
OlderDan said:
How do you define better contrast? If you don't have a definition, then you have to come up with one. A simple definition would be the difference between the intensities of adjacent maxima and minima.

For white light, if you don't already have the intensity vs position relationship, you should be able to integrate over the visible spectrum to find intensity as a function of position.






thanks you Sir......,ill try that
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top