Why Do My Green's Theorem Calculations Not Match?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two problems using Green's Theorem, where the user struggles with discrepancies between double integrals and line integrals. In the first problem, the user correctly computes the double integral over a rectangle but finds that the line integral results in zero due to incorrect orientation during integration. The second problem involves a triangle, where the user is unsure how to set up the line integral along the hypotenuse and is advised to use parametric equations for accurate integration. Emphasis is placed on ensuring the line integral's direction matches the curve's orientation and correctly handling the different normal vectors for each triangle side. Understanding these concepts is crucial for successfully applying Green's Theorem.
Chronocidal Guy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
K, I'm puzzled to death on a two problems involving Green's Theorem. They both are asking me to confirm that Green's theorem works for a given example, so I have to compute both the double integral over the area and the integral over the closed curve and make sure that they match.. only, on one problem the answer's don't match at all, and the other I'm stuck setting up the integral.

First one: Integrate the function F= x*yi +x^2*yj over a rectangle that has points (0,0), (a,0), (a,b), (0,b), going counterclockwise. I've gotten the double integral for the area perfectly according to the answer section ( (a*b^2)/2 + (a^3*b)/3 ), but the answer I get for the curve integral doesn't match. I broke the square into four curves, C(1) through C(4), and integrated each separately using F (dot) n, the dot product of the function and the exterior normal vector. But, when I do this, I get four separate integrals, which form two pairs of identical integrals in opposite directions.. they all cancel and the answer I get is zero. The answer guide for my textbook does it the same way, but the two negative terms that cause the cancellation just seem to be dropped during the last step for some reason. Am I missing something really simple here that let's those two integrals drop away?

Second: Nearly identical problem, except in this case, F= cos(x+y)i + sin(x+y)j, and the area in question is a triangle with points (0,0), (a,0), and (a,b). Again, the double integral for the area went smoothly, but I'm stuck setting up the three separate curve integrals. I've gotten the two legs of the triangle, but how do I set up the integral along the hypoteneuse? I'm guessing I need a double integral since for the third side x is going from a to zero, and y is going from b to zero... but the equation I need to integrate is F (dot) n = cos(x+y)dy/ds + sin(x+y)dx/ds . Do I need to evaluate one integral, and then plug the answer from that into the next integral, or do I need to add them together, or do I need to do something entirely different?

Hope this makes sense to whoever reads this, I'm just kind of panicking at the moment because I have a physics midterm tomorrow, and the math homework is ruining my study time. :P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chronocidal Guy said:
First one: Integrate the function F= x*yi +x^2*yj over a rectangle that has points (0,0), (a,0), (a,b), (0,b), going counterclockwise. I've gotten the double integral for the area perfectly according to the answer section ( (a*b^2)/2 + (a^3*b)/3 ), but the answer I get for the curve integral doesn't match. I broke the square into four curves, C(1) through C(4), and integrated each separately using F (dot) n, the dot product of the function and the exterior normal vector. But, when I do this, I get four separate integrals, which form two pairs of identical integrals in opposite directions.. they all cancel and the answer I get is zero. The answer guide for my textbook does it the same way, but the two negative terms that cause the cancellation just seem to be dropped during the last step for some reason. Am I missing something really simple here that let's those two integrals drop away?
Be sure to get the right values for x and y when traversing the different line segments. i.e. in going from (0,0) to (a,0), y=0 all the way. On the way back however from (a,b) to (0,b), y=b along the way. Don't treat y as a variable which cancels out at the end. The integral along any line segment should be just a number.
 


Green's Theorem is a powerful tool for solving problems involving line integrals and double integrals. However, like any tool, it can have its limitations and challenges. In your first problem, it seems that you have correctly set up the double integral over the given rectangle, but are having trouble setting up the line integral over the boundary. It is important to note that when using Green's Theorem, the line integral over the boundary should be in the same direction as the orientation of the curve. In this case, the orientation of the curve is counterclockwise, so the line integral should also be in the counterclockwise direction. It seems that you have broken the boundary into four curves, but have integrated them in the opposite direction. This is why the two negative terms cancel out and you get a final answer of zero. To correct this, you can either change the orientation of the line integral or change the orientation of the curve.

In your second problem, you are correct in thinking that you need to set up a double integral for the line integral along the hypotenuse. However, instead of plugging in the values of x and y, you need to use the parametric equations for the hypotenuse. In this case, x = a-t and y = bt, where t is the parameter that goes from 0 to 1. This will give you the correct expression for the line integral along the hypotenuse. As for the other two line integrals, you have correctly set them up using the equations F dot n, but you need to integrate them separately and then add them together to get the final answer. This is because each side of the triangle has a different normal vector and therefore, a different line integral.

I understand that this may seem overwhelming and time-consuming, especially with a midterm approaching. However, it is important to take the time to understand the concepts and methods behind Green's Theorem in order to solve these types of problems. I would suggest seeking help from a tutor or classmate, or going to your teacher's office hours for further clarification. Good luck on your midterm!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top