A Why do novas shine?

AI Thread Summary
A nova occurs in a close binary system where a white dwarf siphons hydrogen from its companion, leading to nuclear fusion on its surface. This fusion generates energy primarily in the form of visible light due to the white dwarf's atmosphere, which acts similarly to a star's photosphere. During a nova event, the photosphere expands dramatically, resulting in a significant increase in luminosity. Bremsstrahlung radiation from the ejected material also contributes to the light observed in novae. Ultimately, the fusion surface remains shielded, allowing the emission of visible light rather than just gamma rays or cosmic rays.
Brzohn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
It’s my understanding that a nova happens when you have a close binary star, and one component is a white dwarf. The white dwarf sucks hydrogen from its companion, the hydrogen piles up on the surface of the dwarf until it’s hot and dense enough to undergo nuclear fusion. Ka-boom. Right?

Why is this energy visible light? Nuclear reactions produce energy in the form of gamma rays and moving particles. The reaction is on the surface of the star; the energy isn’t emitted in the middle of an atmosphere that it could be Compton scattered down the spectrum, or heat up the atmosphere till it glows. By my reasoning, a nova should emit gamma and cosmic rays, but not visible light. What’s going on?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Until just about now I've had the same misconception as you, I think. That the white dwarf is essentially a naked core emitter.
Take a look at this paper:
https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/pdf/2012MmSAI..83..779K
There's a brief overview of the process in the introduction.

The key takeaways seem to be:
The nova white dwarf has an atmosphere accreted from its companion. It then emits light from its photosphere, much like a regular star. The photosphere expands significantly during the nova event, on the order of a hundred solar radii, giving rise to the initial luminosity spike. Subsequently, Bremsstrahlung radiation in the ejecta take over as the main contributor to the light curve.
I.e. it doesn't appear to be the case that the fusing surface is ever exposed.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes davenn and Drakkith
By the same argument, the sun should not emit visible light either. Does that point you in the right direction?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top