Why Do People Confess to Crimes They Didn't Commit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jedishrfu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Science
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the complexities of information elicitation in both law enforcement and software engineering. It emphasizes the challenges faced when trying to gather accurate information, particularly in high-stakes situations like criminal confessions, where techniques like the Reid Technique can lead to false confessions. The conversation draws parallels to software troubleshooting, illustrating how even cooperative dialogue can yield misleading results. A specific example is shared where a tester and developer worked together to resolve a race condition in software, showcasing the importance of collaboration and respect between different roles in tech. Ultimately, the narrative underscores the need for careful communication and the understanding that even the most diligent efforts can lead to unexpected outcomes.
Physics news on Phys.org
As a software engineer, I often need to elicit information from others: Requirements, technical specs, how something failed, etc.
Sometimes it's easy. More often it is not. Even the most careful, cooperative conversation can be misleading. The fact that the Reid Technique is used by law enforcement to collect such critical information is scary.
The best confessions are the ones that reveal "guilty information" - information that is to available to people not involved in the crime.

The Science Mag story talks about tracking down a potential problem with a computer crash. I have certainly been there. It is possible for some people to accurately reproduce exactly what they have mistakenly done (assuming they ever discovered it), but it's not common. In the best of cases, the person can, through experimentation, reproduce the problem. But failing that, the best I can do is understand and capture exactly what they are saying and know that in all probability, what they are saying is basically substantive - but from the point of view of someone that was caught off guard by the situation.
 
Last edited:
I got to see first hand a pro tester and developer duke it out in a friendly way.

The tester found a race condition when keys were hit in a certain order. The developer confidently fixed it but the tester typed a little faster and it occurred again.

The last battle before it was finally fixed.

The developer brought in his code and the tester was typing furiously think ” Flight of the Bumblebee “ and after a few minutes boom it broke again.

A day later and a new design fixed it once and for all never to reappear.

No customer was harmed that day but the tester and and developer found great reasons to really respect each others profession.

The tester moved on to become a manager of managers and the developer moved on to other software ventures.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top