Why Do Phonons Exhibit Spin 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phonon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boson Phonon
phonon
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have searched in a lot of books and online resources, and none of them shed any light on why phonons are bosons.

Can someone here help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because it carries a spin of zero.

Zz.
 
Phonons are the quantization of vibrations in a solid. Since vibrations are additive, that is, you can double and triple a (small) vibration and have still be vibration but twice or three times as strong, phonons must satisfy bose statistics. That is, they do not satisfy the Pauli exclusion principle. So they're bosons.

Carl
 
phonon said:
I have searched in a lot of books and online resources, and none of them shed any light on why phonons are bosons.
Can someone here help me?
Phonons are bosons because of their spin 0 value.

A better question would have been : why do phonons have spin 0 ?

Their is a really easy answer if you are familiar with group theory and symmetries.


marlon

marlon
 
Hi,
I was wondering why phonons should have spin zero, too. After all, the quantized system looks just like QED, only with more (!) polarizations, so even in the simplest acoustic case we have one longitudinal and two transversal modes. This looks like spin 1.

On the other hand, spin is defined by the Lorentz-group, i.e. the behavior under rotations, which is not exactly usable in a lattice. So my guess is that this reduction of the full rotational group to the discrete rotation group causes the concept of spin to break down.

Is this about right? Books are amazingly useless when it comes to phonon spin...

regards,
torus
 
marlon said:
Phonons are bosons because of their spin 0 value.

A better question would have been : why do phonons have spin 0 ?

Their is a really easy answer if you are familiar with group theory and symmetries.


marlon

marlon

What is the group theory reason for this?
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top