Why Do Photons and Gravitons Have Classical Counterparts in QFT?

karlzr
Messages
129
Reaction score
2
In QFT, all particles can be interpreted as excitations of some fundamental quantum fields in the vacuum. This is the quantum picture. But in classical world, only photons and gravitons have classical counterparts. How to explain this? The common feature of these two is that they are intermediate particles of long-range interactions. But This is far from satisfactory to me. So I was wondering whether there is a deeper and better explanation of this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Roughly speaking, quantum fields look like classical waves when there are many particles in the same state. So classical electromagnetic waves are states of many photons and classical gravitational waves are states of many gravitons.

Fermion fields don't have any states that look classical, because you cannot put more than one fermion in the same state. So there is no classical analog of the electron field.

The W, Z, and Higgs fields are bosonic but they never look classical because these bosons all decay long before you could hope to construct a state containing lots of them. (This is pretty much the same thing as saying that they don't mediate long-range interactions.)

The gluon field undergoes confinement and so there aren't actually any states that look like gluons, let alone states with many coherent gluons. There are only hadrons and glueballs.
 
karlzr said:
But in classical world, only photons and gravitons have classical counterparts.
What do you mean by this? What is "classical" about photons and gravitons?
 
The_Duck said:
Roughly speaking, quantum fields look like classical waves when there are many particles in the same state. So classical electromagnetic waves are states of many photons and classical gravitational waves are states of many gravitons.

For the static electric field around an electric charge, how to understand it from the perspective of quantum fields? In the absence of test particle, I guess there is no photons except vacuum bubble. So can we say there is no electric field unless a test particle is placed nearby to have virtual photon exchange?

Meir Achuz said:
What do you mean by this? What is "classical" about photons and gravitons?
Of course we don't have quanta in classical world. I mean the classical wave or field: EM field or radiation, gravitational field or gravitational wave.
 
karlzr said:
For the static electric field around an electric charge, how to understand it from the perspective of quantum fields?

In covariant QED the static Coulomb field is mediated by the scalar and longitudinal photons which exist even in vacuum (where no transverse photons are present).
 
WannabeNewton said:
In covariant QED the static Coulomb field is mediated by the scalar and longitudinal photons which exist even in vacuum (where no transverse photons are present).

Doesn't the scalar mode always cancel out the longitudinal mode?
If there is no test particle, where do the scalar and longitudinal modes end?
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
182
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
91
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top