Why do photons/electrons scatter at angles in compton scattering?

AI Thread Summary
Photons scatter at angles other than 0 or 180 degrees due to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, which implies that while a photon has a defined momentum, its position is uncertain. This uncertainty leads to varying impact parameters, resulting in a spectrum of scattering angles. The scattering process can be described classically by Thomson scattering and relativistically by Compton scattering, with both methods yielding similar results for photon energies up to about 100 keV. The conservation of energy and momentum in multiple planes is crucial for understanding the kinematics of the scattering process. Overall, the complexity of photon-electron scattering is rooted in quantum mechanics and the principles governing particle interactions.
nlsherrill
Messages
320
Reaction score
1
This is something that I always just took for granted, but I have no idea how a photon scatters off of an electron at an angle other than 0 or 180 degrees. I haven't seen this mentioned in a modern physics or nuclear engineering textbook either, so I assuming its a pretty complicated reason?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An incident photon has a well-defined momentum. According to the Heisenberg's Uncertainty principle, its position is unknown. Particularly, the impact parameter, as defined in classical scattering theory, is not defined and may take any value. But, different impact parameters correspond to different scattering angles, so you get a whole spectrum of scattering angles.

More formally, the scattering matrix element between two plane-wave states is non-zero. The square of the modulus, multiplied by the available phase space around the final state, gives the scattering cross section.
 
Dickfore,

Thanks for the quick reply! So essentially all comes down to the uncertainty principle? I understand classical scattering and understood the connection you made to an impact parameter.
 
The inelastic scattering of a photon off of a free stationary electron is described classically by Thomson scattering, and relativistically by Compton scattering. The two solutions agree for photon energies up to roughly 100 keV.
The kinematics requires conservation of energy, and conservation of momentum in both longitudinal and transverse planes (3 unknowns, and 3 equations total). This is very similar to billiard ball kinematics.

See Section 4 in http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node92.html for a discussion of Thomson scattering.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top