Why do planets revolve in elliptical orbits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spideyinspace
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbits Planets
AI Thread Summary
Planets revolve in elliptical orbits due to Newton's law of gravitation, where the gravitational force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between two objects. Mathematically, objects under this force that lack sufficient energy to escape will follow elliptical paths, with the larger mass at one focus. While circular orbits can occur under specific conditions, most planetary orbits are elliptical due to the significant mass difference between the sun and the planets. Additionally, gravitational interactions among planets and relativistic effects cause slight distortions in these orbits. Understanding these principles explains the elliptical nature of planetary motion.
spideyinspace
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
we know that planets revolve in elliptical orbits but Why should planets revolve in elliptical orbits?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
spideyinspace said:
we know that planets revolve in elliptical orbits but Why should planets revolve in elliptical orbits?

It is a consequence of Newton's law of gravitation.
See e.g. here
 
spideyinspace said:
we know that planets revolve in elliptical orbits but Why should planets revolve in elliptical orbits?

In Newton's theory of gravity, the gravitational force on an object moving near a more massive object is proportional to 1/r^2 where r is the distance between the objects. When one works out mathematically the path for an object which is falling freely under the influence of such a force (but doesn't have enough energy to completely escape) the general answer is an ellipse where the large mass is at one focus.

There are of course some special cases; the obvious one is that if the orbital speed is just right for the distance, the path is a circle. Another is that if the falling mass is heading straight for the other mass, the path is a straight line downwards.

In the case of the planets, the sun is so much more massive than the planets that each planet basically moves in an ellipse around the sun, but the planets also have a very slight effect on the sun (especially Jupiter) and on each other, which distort the ellipses, and there are also other effects related to relativity which cause some further very slight distortions.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top