Why do some nebulae form into stars while others remain diffuse?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nova
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Nebulae vary in their ability to form stars due to differences in density and gravitational forces. Some nebulae are too diffuse, lacking sufficient gravity to collapse into stars, while others have enough density to trigger star formation. The Orion Nebula serves as an example, where dense regions lead to the formation of hot young stars. The gravitational forces within these clouds play a crucial role in determining their fate. Ultimately, the density of a nebula is key to whether it remains diffuse or evolves into a star.
Nova
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Since Nebulae are in "cloud" like structures, why does it not form itself into a sphere based on the highest density of which the largest amount of mass is held? resembling an extremely large gas planet.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Some nebulae are simply too diffuse for the gravitation forces to be high enough to pull them together...and ones that are dense enough eventually collapse into stars.
 
russ_watters said:
Welcome to PF!

Some nebulae are simply too diffuse for the gravitation forces to be high enough to pull them together...and ones that are dense enough eventually collapse into stars.

yup
as with the hot young stars of the Trapesium in the Orion Nebula ( M42)

Dave
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Back
Top