Why do we add Kinetic and Potential energy?

AI Thread Summary
Kinetic and potential energy are both scalar quantities, allowing for their straightforward addition to determine total energy. This combined value is referred to as "mechanical energy." Total energy encompasses all forms of energy, including those affected by dissipative forces that do not conserve mechanical energy. Potential energy can vary in sign, being positive or negative based on changes in distance. Thus, the addition of kinetic and potential energy remains a scalar operation.
akashpandey
Messages
90
Reaction score
4
As we know Energy is a scalar quantity.
So when we add kinetic and potential energy to get Total energy.
So addicting these two energy (kinetic and potential) comes under Scalar addition ?
I just wanted to confirm it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes.
 
Also, note that the scalar sum of kinetic and potential energy is called "mechanical energy." "Total energy" is the sum of all energies and includes energy transformations brought about by dissipative forces that do not conserve mechanical energy.
 
akashpandey said:
Summary:: Adding Kinetic and Potential energy is Scalar addition.

As we know Energy is a scalar quantity.
Having a sign doesn't prevent a scalar from being a scalar. Potential energy can be positive or negative, depending on whether it increases or decreases as the distance changes.
 

Thread 'Inclined treadmills and Galilean Invariance'

This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
View full post »
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'

Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
View full post »

Thread 'Is calling fictitious forces "not real" just about terminology?'

Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Can energy be decomposed?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Let a standing wave of length L go, get traveling wave of length 2L?
Replies
11
Views
1K
Kinetic energy and potential energy look very dissimilar
Replies
10
Views
2K
I How to interpret this definition of potential energy?
Replies
10
Views
2K
Escape Velocity Question: Why is the final kinetic energy = 0?
Replies
21
Views
5K
I Why is momentum considered a vector and kinetic energy a scalar?
Replies
15
Views
3K
I Change of coordinates in a potential energy field
Replies
2
Views
1K
Is the rotational KE of a rigid body considered as internal energy?
Replies
30
Views
3K
Internal forces converting kinetic into potential energy (vice versa)
Replies
10
Views
2K
"External" potential energies strike back
Replies
6
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top