Why do we consider higher dimensional operators in the search for new physics?

shakeel
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I am confuse about the dimension of an operator? Why we need an operator of Dim six or greater for new physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a little unclear how/what you don't understand.

Dimension 6 or greater operators are non renormalizable, so traditionally we don't write them down. But experience with the renormalization group tells us that we should consider those terms as well, so sometimes when we look for "new physics" we do it by considering higher dimensional operators. However, I believe this isn't necessary for new physics, for example supersymmetric extensions of the standard model contain new renormalizable terms, so these terms are of dimension 4 but aren't in the standard model.

Maybe you can elaborate a little bit more about what you know about physics (specifically quantum field theory)?
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
997
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
71
Views
14K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Back
Top