High School Why do we know space-time is locally flat?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fxdung
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flat Space-time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Space-time is known to be locally flat, allowing the use of differentiable 4-manifolds in General Relativity (GR), as confirmed by experimental results that align with Special Relativity predictions. The Equivalence Principle (EP) supports this understanding but does not provide the foundational proof of its truth. Current theories do not indicate any observable signs of quantization in space-time, as effects would occur at the Planck length, far beyond current experimental capabilities. The quest for a theory of quantum gravity remains unresolved, with speculation that space-time may eventually be quantized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR)
  • Familiarity with the Equivalence Principle (EP)
  • Knowledge of Minkowski space-time
  • Basic concepts of quantum mechanics and Planck length
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Equivalence Principle in General Relativity
  • Explore the concept of Minkowski space-time in detail
  • Investigate current theories and models of quantum gravity
  • Study experimental approaches to probing the Planck length
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the foundations of General Relativity and the ongoing search for a theory of quantum gravity.

fxdung
Messages
387
Reaction score
23
Why do we know space-time is locally flat,then we can use differentiable 4-manifold to describe the space-time?Do the Equivalence Principle say this?Classically space-time in GR is smooth,but what about if we consider the quantum effect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fxdung said:
Why do we know space-time is locally flat,then we can use differentiable 4-manifold to describe the space-time?

Because doing so gives us a theory, General Relativity, that matches the results of experiments to very high accuracy.

fxdung said:
Do the Equivalence Principle say this?

The EP says so, yes, but that's not why we know it's true, because it just shifts the question to, why do we know that the EP is true? The answer to that is the same answer I gave above.

fxdung said:
Classically space-time in GR is smooth,but what about if we consider the quantum effect?

No one has ever observed any signs of spacetime itself being quantized. According to most physicists, this is to be expected since if spacetime is quantized, the length scale on which we would expect to see such effects is roughly the Planck length, which is 20 orders of magnitude smaller than the smallest length scale we can probe experimentally (roughly the size of an atomic nucleus).
 
Then what is Quantum Gravity?What is quantized in this theory?
 
fxdung said:
Then what is Quantum Gravity?What is quantized in this theory?

We don't know because we don't have a theory of quantum gravity. Many physicists believe that spacetime will end up being quantized in such a theory, but that's only a speculation at this point.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
fxdung said:
Why do we know space-time is locally flat

Empirically speaking - because every experiment we perform in a small enough local region matches the predictions of Special Relativity. Since that model is based on flat Minkowski spacetime, we can deduce that spacetime is locally flat. There are of course also more theoretical reasons, but I think you can get my drift.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
918
  • · Replies 99 ·
4
Replies
99
Views
12K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K