Ryder Rude
- 41
- 6
Sorry I was viewing it on mobile. I had to slide it to see it fullkuruman said:Isn't that what I have?
The discussion revolves around the concepts of center of mass (CoM) and center of gravity (CoG), particularly in the context of their relevance in non-uniform gravitational fields. Participants explore the implications of these concepts in relation to motion, rotation, and external forces, examining the necessity of distinguishing between the two ideas.
Participants express differing views on the necessity and implications of the center of gravity versus the center of mass, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.
The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of gravitational fields and external forces, with some participants emphasizing the limitations of applying the center of mass concept in non-uniform fields.
Sorry I was viewing it on mobile. I had to slide it to see it fullkuruman said:Isn't that what I have?
If the center of gravity (or buoyancy or any other distributed force) is different from the center of mass then the force acts through the center of gravity (etc) and therefore produces a torque about the center of mass. The motion of the body then cannot be described simply by the path of the center of mass. The object will rotate about the center of mass. Modeling this torque is the reason for distinguishing the center of mass from the center of gravity (etc).Ryder Rude said:The center of mass point literally follows the path that a particle of mass M would've followed if the forces on the system were thought of as directly acting on that point.