Why do we observe only microwaves in the background radiation?

AI Thread Summary
The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation is predominantly observed in the microwave range due to the expansion of the universe, which has stretched the wavelengths from their original emission at about 3,000 kelvin. Initially, this radiation included visible light, but over 13 billion years, it has shifted to longer wavelengths. The CMB is a result of black body radiation from the early universe, and its intensity is now too low to be distinguished from noise by detection devices. Even if the CMB were in the visible spectrum, it would likely remain too faint to be seen, leaving the night sky black. The discussion highlights the challenges of detecting faint background radiation and the effects of cosmic expansion on electromagnetic radiation.
genefalk
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Why aren't the other bands (visible, UV, etc.) in the electromagnetic spectrum also seen today as part of the background radiation?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
When the CMB was first emitted, the plasma filling all of space was at a temperature of around 3,000 kelvin and much of the radiation was in the visible range. However, over the last 13 billion years the expansion of space has stretched out the radiation until the wavelengths now fall mostly in the microwave range.
 
  • Like
Likes 2 people
The CMB is now stretched by a factor of 1090, as Drakkith noted. That 3000K emission is the only known EM radiation source in the universe at age 380,000 years.
 
If you are familiar with the theory of black body radiation, you realize that at a given temperature all matter radiates a broad spectrum of emr. Since any detection device is comprised of matter, there is an intensity of emr which is simply not differentiable from equipment noise. (not to mention external sources). Take a look at the recent report from antarctica on the CMB polarization. It took them 3 years to make sure what they thought they were seeing wasn't an artifact. Basically, its the same reason as why we couldn't see the meteor that struck Russia (till it was right on top of us) ...its called "glare".
 
If the background radiation that we see today were in the visible range (for example red), would the night sky be red instead of black?
 
genefalk said:
If the background radiation that we see today were in the visible range (for example red), would the night sky be red instead of black?

The light would still be very faint, as there's very little energy density of the CMB now. I doubt you would be able to see it even if it was in the visible spectrum.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
297
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Back
Top