Why do we observe only microwaves in the background radiation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter genefalk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Microwaves Radiation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation and why other parts of the electromagnetic spectrum, such as visible light and ultraviolet, are not observed as part of the background radiation today. The scope includes theoretical explanations and implications of cosmic expansion on radiation wavelengths.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why other electromagnetic bands are not observed in the background radiation.
  • Another participant explains that the CMB was originally emitted at a temperature of around 3,000 kelvin, which included visible radiation, but has since been redshifted to the microwave range due to the expansion of space over 13 billion years.
  • A different participant notes that the CMB has been stretched by a factor of 1090 and emphasizes that the 3000K emission is the only known source of electromagnetic radiation at the universe's age of 380,000 years.
  • One participant discusses the concept of black body radiation, suggesting that all matter radiates a broad spectrum of electromagnetic radiation, which can be indistinguishable from equipment noise, complicating detection.
  • Another participant poses a hypothetical question about whether the night sky would appear red if the background radiation were in the visible range, noting that the energy density of the CMB is currently very low.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints regarding the nature of the CMB and its implications, with no consensus reached on the broader implications of the background radiation's characteristics.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention limitations related to detection methods and the influence of external sources on measurements, as well as the faintness of the CMB in the current energy density context.

genefalk
Messages
13
Reaction score
1
Why aren't the other bands (visible, UV, etc.) in the electromagnetic spectrum also seen today as part of the background radiation?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
When the CMB was first emitted, the plasma filling all of space was at a temperature of around 3,000 kelvin and much of the radiation was in the visible range. However, over the last 13 billion years the expansion of space has stretched out the radiation until the wavelengths now fall mostly in the microwave range.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 2 people
The CMB is now stretched by a factor of 1090, as Drakkith noted. That 3000K emission is the only known EM radiation source in the universe at age 380,000 years.
 
If you are familiar with the theory of black body radiation, you realize that at a given temperature all matter radiates a broad spectrum of emr. Since any detection device is comprised of matter, there is an intensity of emr which is simply not differentiable from equipment noise. (not to mention external sources). Take a look at the recent report from antarctica on the CMB polarization. It took them 3 years to make sure what they thought they were seeing wasn't an artifact. Basically, its the same reason as why we couldn't see the meteor that struck Russia (till it was right on top of us) ...its called "glare".
 
If the background radiation that we see today were in the visible range (for example red), would the night sky be red instead of black?
 
genefalk said:
If the background radiation that we see today were in the visible range (for example red), would the night sky be red instead of black?

The light would still be very faint, as there's very little energy density of the CMB now. I doubt you would be able to see it even if it was in the visible spectrum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K