Why do we only average and sum over two independent polarizations in scattering?

  • Thread starter Thread starter knightq
  • Start date Start date
knightq
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Take the scattering of photon and electron as example, we first figure out the amptitude for transition definte polarization,
say f(\epsilon_{\alpha}(\textbf{k}),\epsilon_{\alpha'} (\textbf{k}'))
If the initial photon is unpolarized and the final polarization is not observed, we need to average the initial polarization and sum over the possible final polarization.
But why we just average and sum over the two independent polarization,\frac{1}{2}\sum_{\alpha}\sum_{\alpha'}f? the initial and final polarization should be all possible combination of the independent polarizatition.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The reason why we only average and sum over the two independent polarizations is because we are assuming that the initial photon is unpolarized. Unpolarized light contains all possible polarizations, so it is not necessary to consider all possible combinations of the two independent polarizations. Additionally, since we are not observing the final polarization, we can take advantage of the fact that all possible final polarizations will contribute the same amount of intensity, so it is not necessary to consider each combination individually. Instead, we can just average the initial polarization and sum over the possible final polarizations.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top