Why Do We Use Light Signals to Measure Time?

crimsonidol
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
why do we use light signals to measure time?
In flat spacetime

Let's say we have two observers in one's rest frame the other one has velocity v. We suppose each of them sent light signals to other one with time separation of Δt(their proper time) and measure time accordingly.we see time dilation here. so far everything is ok for me.

But I think I'm missing something and I do not get that. Do we have to use light signals?

In the same situtation what if observers throw rocks with velocity w again with time separation Δt. Both should see the rocks thrown from other one with velocity w' with different signs.Shouldn't this method measure time dilation with same accuracy? if it can , can't we built this method to build coordinate lattices?

I assumed that we know Lorentz transformations and limiting speed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We use clocks to measure time - though one can, in principle, define a "light clock" given a ruler, there's no special need to use this particular sort of clock - and in fact we usually use other sorts of clocks, atomic clocks being the most accurate.

We use light signals to synchronize clocks. We could use other means, but light signals are easy. If you're familiar with the limiting speed concept, you can see that we could use ultra-relativistic particle beams to synchronize clocks too, but why bother when we know they'll travel at the same speed as the more easily generated light beams.
 
i got the point.. I see it was a silly question .Thanks for the answer.
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...

Similar threads

Replies
42
Views
802
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
53
Views
6K
Replies
93
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top