physicstime Messages 10 Reaction score 0 Thread starter Oct 27, 2012 #1 Can someone explain why the force P with which the man must pull on the rope to achieve an acceleration a m/s2 IS NOT (m+M)(a+g)/2 and is instead (m+M)(a+g). M+m is the combined mass of man and platform. Why does 2T-(M+m)g=(M+m)a not work here? Attachments phpHAbcw5.jpg 9.2 KB · Views: 481
Can someone explain why the force P with which the man must pull on the rope to achieve an acceleration a m/s2 IS NOT (m+M)(a+g)/2 and is instead (m+M)(a+g). M+m is the combined mass of man and platform. Why does 2T-(M+m)g=(M+m)a not work here?
JustinRyan Messages 87 Reaction score 0 Oct 27, 2012 #2 when he pulls the rope, an equal and opposite force is exerted on the platform.
physicstime Messages 10 Reaction score 0 Oct 27, 2012 #3 Thanks for the response. But doesn't the platform have an equal and opposite normal force?
JustinRyan Messages 87 Reaction score 0 Oct 27, 2012 #4 Exactly why greater force is required to accelerate the mass of the man + platform. 2P=(m+M)(g+a)+P
physicstime Messages 10 Reaction score 0 Oct 27, 2012 #5 but doesn't the tension of the rope on the other side contribute just as much as the man therefore doubling the total force upwards?
but doesn't the tension of the rope on the other side contribute just as much as the man therefore doubling the total force upwards?
JustinRyan Messages 87 Reaction score 0 Oct 27, 2012 #6 Yes, and that is the only reason he can lift himself. This is why the left is 2P.