Why Does a 26mm Port Improve CO2 Diffusion in Cell Culture Vessels?

  • Thread starter Thread starter soe236
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Co2 Exchange Gas
AI Thread Summary
A 26mm port in cell culture vessels significantly enhances CO2 diffusion, leading to improved cell survival compared to a 10mm port. The larger port likely facilitates faster gas exchange, which is crucial since the cells require a 5% CO2 environment. The discussion raises questions about the underlying principles, such as Brownian motion or Bernoulli's principle, to explain the observed differences in volumetric flow rates. However, the exact impact of filter resistance and hole area percentage remains unclear. Measuring CO2 concentration over time could provide more definitive insights into the diffusion dynamics.
soe236
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I have to pick the best cell culture vessel:
For my experiments, the vessel initially contains 0% CO2. Then it's placed in an incubator set to 37 degreesC and 5% CO2. There is a 1 micron filter i can attach to a port in the vessel that can be 10mm wide or a .2 micron filter can be attached to a port that is 26mm wide. Experimentally the vessel with the 26mm port proves to be better as more cells survive--probably because CO2 diffuses quicker (I assume)--and 5%CO2 is necessary for the cells. I'm just not able to justify the result--can anyone please explain why this might be occurring based on any theories like brownian motion or bernoulli's principle maybe?? Basically I need some kind of an equation that justies that the volumetric flow rate is much faster/better in the vessel that has a 26mm port instead of the 10mm ports (regardless of the filter device--which probably acts as resistance).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Insufficient information, really, since while you know the size of the holes, you don't know the % of hole area. (after all it wouldn't matter if the filter was huge if it only had one hole in it!) If you assume it's the same in both filters, then obviously the larger one will let gas through faster.

It sounds a bit strange. I'd expect the gas concentration to equilibrate within minutes, whereas incubation times are on the order of 10-20h, aren't they? I'd expect the effect to be quite small.

Either way, it'd really be easier to just measure the concentration over time. Surely if the CO2 concentration is so vital you must have some means of measuring it?
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top