Why Does a Functional Depend on the Curve and Its Derivative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter "Don't panic!"
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functionals
"Don't panic!"
Messages
600
Reaction score
8
First of all, apologies if this isn't quite in the right section.

I've been studying functionals, in particular pertaining to variational calculus. My query relates to defining a functional as an integral over some interval x\in [a,b] in the following manner I[y]= \int_{a}^{b} F\left(x, y(x), y'(x)\right)dx
Clearly from this we see that I is not dependent on x, but instead it depends only on the function y(x). I is a functional and as such it defines a mapping from the set of all functions y(x) satisfying y(a)=0=y(b) to \mathbb{R}.

My question really, is why the integrand a function of the set of curves y(x) (as defined above) and their derivatives y'(x) (I've kept it to first-order for simplicity, but I know that in general it can be dependent on higher orders)?

Is this because, as I is depends on every single value that y(x) takes in the interval x\in [a, b], and not just its value at a single point, we must consider how y(x) changes (i.e. we must consider it's derivatives) over this interval as we integrate over it. Thus, this implies that the integrand should be a function of the curve and it's rate of change?

Please could someone let me know if my thinking is correct, and if not, provide an explanation.

Thanks for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Don't panic!" said:
the set of all functions y(x) satisfying y(a)=0=y(b) to \mathbb{R}.

Sorry, I meant the set of all functions y(x) satisfying \delta y(a)=0=\delta y(b) to \mathbb{R}.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top