I Why Does a Rank One Matrix with a=1 Still Have Solutions?

Carbon273
Messages
17
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
What conditions will there be no solutions, a unique solution and a p-parameter of solutions? If possible may you express in particular and homogenous vectors. I'm a bit rusty so bear with me, trying to reestablish my understanding here.
1569891740199.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd strongly suggest multiplying by a permutation matrix ##\mathbf P## so that the LHS matrix is

##\mathbf {11}^T + (a-1)\mathbf I##
and the RHS has the natural progression of ##1, a, a^2 ##

assuming this is in reals, you should be able to confirm that any ##a \neq 1, -2## implies an invertible matrix. And ##a=1## still has (at least one) solution because... and as for ##a=-2## well...
 
Hmm why is that you used that expression for the LHS. I am curious, where does the 11^T comes from?
 
Carbon273 said:
Hmm why is that you used that expression for the LHS. I am curious, where does the 11^T comes from?
because ##\mathbf {11}^T## is the ones matrix and it is easy to work with. The (scaled) Identity matrix is even easier to work with.

and the RHS is most natural as ##1, a, a^2## -- this is called the moment curve.
 
No solution when the determinant of the matrix is 0.
 
mathman said:
No solution when the determinant of the matrix is 0.
This is not correct.

The matrix is rank one when ##a=1## and yet there are ##\gt 0## solutions. e.g. any of the standard basis vectors will do for x here.

I was trying to get OP to come to this conclusion when I said

StoneTemplePython said:
And ##a=1## still has (at least one) solution because...
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top