Why Does a Razor Blade Move Away from a Charged Body on Water?

AI Thread Summary
A razor blade placed on the water surface moves away from a charged body due to induced surface charges that create an electric field. This phenomenon occurs because a charged object induces a charge distribution in nearby conductors, leading to a concentration of charge at edges, like those of the razor blade. The resulting electric field may interact with water molecules, potentially increasing pressure near the blade and causing it to float away. Participants in the discussion express a need for credible sources to better understand and explain this effect. Overall, the interaction between charged bodies and conductors can lead to intriguing physical behaviors that merit further exploration.
ellinas
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
why does a razor blade placed on the water surface move away from a charged body?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't know it did. Can you give us a pointer to a reference that discusses this experiment?
 
could be due to eddy currents
 
Never heard of it. But..

A charged body near a conductor will induce a surface charge, distributed so that there is zero electric field within it (this is similar to dielectrics, and should very weakly attract the conductor, in the absence of other effects). Such a distribution always has to be concentrated at any points or edges (compared to flat surfaces), and so the highest charge density (and strongest electric field) should occur along the razor blade. This most likely transfers charge to water molecules there, or at least raises the water pressure near the blade (dielectric fluid prefers being near high charge density), floating the razor blade in the opposite direction, but that's a bit of a guess.
 
guys hasn't any idea on this?
 
ellinas said:
guys hasn't any idea on this?

As I said, it would help a lot if you could list a credible source for this claim, so that we can go read about it and help to explain it to you. Without a credible source for us to look at, it is unlikely you will get much more than wild guesses.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top