Why Does Adding 's' Change to Subtracting 'c' in This Algebraic Expression?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the algebraic expression involving the terms a, b, c, and s. The user seeks clarification on why adding 's' in their expression leads to subtracting 'c'. It is suggested that to combine the two rational expressions, one should multiply the first expression by (c + s)/(c + s) to achieve a common denominator. There is a consensus that the transformation from +s to -c is incorrect. The goal is to simplify the expression correctly without altering the fundamental terms.
roadworx
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have:

\frac{a}{b+a+s} + \frac{c*b}{(b+a+s)(c+s)}

I can rearrange that to:

\frac{a-c}{b+a-c} * \frac{b+a}{b+a+s} + \frac{b}{b+a-c} * \frac{c}{c+s}

Is this correct? If so, can someone tell me why the +s changes into a -c?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should supply the steps. Also what are you trying to achieve?
A simpler expression is (ac + as + bc)/[(b + a + s)(c + s)].
 
roadworx said:
Hi,

I have:

\frac{a}{b+a+s} + \frac{c*b}{(b+a+s)(c+s)}

I can rearrange that to:

\frac{a-c}{b+a-c} * \frac{b+a}{b+a+s} + \frac{b}{b+a-c} * \frac{c}{c+s}

Is this correct? If so, can someone tell me why the +s changes into a -c?
If your goal is to combine the two rational expressions, multiply the one on the left by 1 in the form of (c + s)/(c + s). That gives you the same denominator in both expressions, so you can then add the numerators.

A +s should not change to a -c.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top