Why Does Air Break Up into Swirls Behind a Blunt Body in Fast Motion?

AI Thread Summary
Air breaks up into swirls behind a blunt body due to the boundary layer effect, where viscosity causes the fluid to have zero velocity near the surface. As air moves around the object, the boundary layer can separate, creating low-pressure recirculating bubbles and leading to vortex formation. The stability of these vortices is influenced by the Reynolds number, with instability causing them to shed in an alternating pattern at higher velocities. The drag force equation, D = 1/2CρAv², is primarily empirical, with the drag coefficient C_D determined through experiments. The effective cross-sectional area A varies based on the type of drag being analyzed, such as frontal area for pressure drag and wetted area for viscous drag.
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5
At the moment, I am reading about fluids and the drag force. There is one particular paragraph that I would like help with, specifically the part in red:
"Here we examine only cases in which air is the fluid, the body is blunt (like
a baseball) rather than slender (like a javelin), and the relative motion is fast
enough so that the air becomes turbulent (breaks up into swirls) behind the body."

Why does the air break up into swirls behind the body?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Also, in the next paragraph the author begins talking about an equation for the force of drag, D = 1/2C\rho Av^2. How was the equation found? The describe the variable A as "effective cross-sectional area," what does that mean?
 
Bashyboy said:
"Here we examine only cases in which air is the fluid, the body is blunt (like a baseball) rather than slender (like a javelin), and the relative motion is fast enough so that the air becomes turbulent (breaks up into swirls) behind the body."

Why does the air break up into swirls behind the body?

Well, because of viscosity, a fluid must have zero velocity near a surface (relative to that surface). This gives rise to what is called the boundary layer. In a simplified sense, as the air moves around the ball, the boundary layer doesn't have enough energy in it to make its way completely around the back end and ends up separating from the surface. When the boundary layer separates from the surface, it creates essentially a low pressure, recirculating bubble between it and the surface. There are essentially two vortices such as these that form for a circular cylinder (a similar but less complicated case compared to a ball). For low values of the Reynolds number (low velocities), which denotes the ratio of inertial forces to viscous forces, these vortices are stable and remain attacked to the back of the object. At a certain value of the Reynolds number, the system becomes unstable and the vortices begin shedding in an alternating pattern.

This is a fairly complicated problem and it sounds like you don't have any prior fluids experience so I will leave it at this simplified explanation for the time being.

Bashyboy said:
Also, in the next paragraph the author begins talking about an equation for the force of drag, D=1/2CρAv2. How was the equation found? The describe the variable A as "effective cross-sectional area," what does that mean?

That equation is essentially empirical where you find a value for C_D through experiments. There are a handful of cases where it can be calculated approximately, but in general, you need to find that from experiments. The meaning of A depends on what sort of drag you are looking at. For pressure drag, it is the frontal area of the object. For viscous drag it would be the wetted area, etc, though that equation is of limited use for viscous drag.
 
all the equation on friction
 
boneh3ad said:
Well, because of viscosity, a fluid must have zero velocity near a surface (relative to that surface). This gives rise to what is called the boundary layer. In a simplified sense, as the air moves around the ball, the boundary layer doesn't have enough energy in it to make its way completely around the back end and ends up separating from the surface. When the boundary layer separates from the surface, it creates essentially a low pressure, recirculating bubble between it and the surface. There are essentially two vortices such as these that form for a circular cylinder (a similar but less complicated case compared to a ball). For low values of the Reynolds number (low velocities), which denotes the ratio of inertial forces to viscous forces, these vortices are stable and remain attacked to the back of the object. At a certain value of the Reynolds number, the system becomes unstable and the vortices begin shedding in an alternating pattern.

This is a fairly complicated problem and it sounds like you don't have any prior fluids experience so I will leave it at this simplified explanation for the time being.



That equation is essentially empirical where you find a value for C_D through experiments. There are a handful of cases where it can be calculated approximately, but in general, you need to find that from experiments. The meaning of A depends on what sort of drag you are looking at. For pressure drag, it is the frontal area of the object. For viscous drag it would be the wetted area, etc, though that equation is of limited use for viscous drag.

Thank you for that explanation, though most of it was a bit above my understanding. You are right in supposing that have not any experience with fluids, but I'll keep this webpage saved for the time being until I have learned about them.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top