I Why does an ideal gas satisfy ##(\partial U/\partial P)_T=0##?

Click For Summary
The ideal gas is defined by the equations PV=nRT and (∂U/∂P)_T = 0, with the latter indicating that internal energy (U) does not depend on pressure (P) at constant temperature (T). This is justified by the assumption that ideal gas particles do not interact, meaning changes in pressure do not affect internal energy. The internal energy of an ideal monoatomic gas is expressed as 3RnT/2, and differentiating it with respect to pressure at constant temperature yields zero. The discussion highlights that the lack of interaction energy in ideal gases supports this relationship. Thus, the equation (∂U/∂P)_T = 0 is valid due to the negligible interaction energy among gas particles.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
TL;DR
Why does an ideal gas satisfy ##\left (\frac{\partial U}{\partial P}\right )_T = 0##?
The book I am reading says that by definition, the ideal gas satisfies the equations

$$PV=nRT\tag{1}$$

$$\left (\frac{\partial U}{\partial P}\right )_T = 0\tag{2}$$

where does (2) come from? In other words, what justifies this equation in the definition above?
 
Science news on Phys.org
The internal energy of an ideal (monoatomic) gas is ##3RnT/2##. Differentiating with respect to ##P## with ##T## constant is clearly zero.
 
Orodruin said:
The internal energy of an ideal (monoatomic) gas is ##3RnT/2##. Differentiating with respect to ##P## with ##T## constant is clearly zero.
The thing is, I believe that equation comes from the kinetic theory of the ideal gas right.

The chapter of the book that I am on is a few chapters before talking about that theory. The only reason I know about that equation is from looking ahead.

I am wondering about some other justification not based on that theory.
 
Ideal gas is made of particles which do not interact with each other, or more realistically, of particles for which the interaction energy is negligible. By compressing ideal gas while keeping temperature constant you increase the pressure ##P##, but since the interaction energy is negligible, ##U## does not change. This answers the OP's question.
 
  • Like
Likes chimay, weirdoguy, Philip Koeck and 1 other person
Thread 'Can somebody explain this: Planck's Law in action'
Plotted is the Irradiance over Wavelength. Please check for logarithmic scaling. As you can see, there are 4 curves. Blue AM 0 as measured yellow Planck for 5777 K green Planck for, 5777 K after free space expansion red Planck for 1.000.000 K To me the idea of a gamma-Ray-source on earth, below the magnetic field, which protects life on earth from solar radiation, in an intensity, which is way way way outer hand, makes no sense to me. If they really get these high temperatures realized in...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
5K