I Why does an ideal gas satisfy ##(\partial U/\partial P)_T=0##?

AI Thread Summary
The ideal gas is defined by the equations PV=nRT and (∂U/∂P)_T = 0, with the latter indicating that internal energy (U) does not depend on pressure (P) at constant temperature (T). This is justified by the assumption that ideal gas particles do not interact, meaning changes in pressure do not affect internal energy. The internal energy of an ideal monoatomic gas is expressed as 3RnT/2, and differentiating it with respect to pressure at constant temperature yields zero. The discussion highlights that the lack of interaction energy in ideal gases supports this relationship. Thus, the equation (∂U/∂P)_T = 0 is valid due to the negligible interaction energy among gas particles.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
TL;DR Summary
Why does an ideal gas satisfy ##\left (\frac{\partial U}{\partial P}\right )_T = 0##?
The book I am reading says that by definition, the ideal gas satisfies the equations

$$PV=nRT\tag{1}$$

$$\left (\frac{\partial U}{\partial P}\right )_T = 0\tag{2}$$

where does (2) come from? In other words, what justifies this equation in the definition above?
 
Science news on Phys.org
The internal energy of an ideal (monoatomic) gas is ##3RnT/2##. Differentiating with respect to ##P## with ##T## constant is clearly zero.
 
Orodruin said:
The internal energy of an ideal (monoatomic) gas is ##3RnT/2##. Differentiating with respect to ##P## with ##T## constant is clearly zero.
The thing is, I believe that equation comes from the kinetic theory of the ideal gas right.

The chapter of the book that I am on is a few chapters before talking about that theory. The only reason I know about that equation is from looking ahead.

I am wondering about some other justification not based on that theory.
 
Ideal gas is made of particles which do not interact with each other, or more realistically, of particles for which the interaction energy is negligible. By compressing ideal gas while keeping temperature constant you increase the pressure ##P##, but since the interaction energy is negligible, ##U## does not change. This answers the OP's question.
 
  • Like
Likes chimay, weirdoguy, Philip Koeck and 1 other person
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top