Why does an object fall in the same time as it takes to reach a peak

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikeza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fall Peak Time
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a kangaroo jumping to a height of 2.8 meters and the time it spends in the air. The subject area includes kinematics and the equations of motion under uniform acceleration due to gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand why an object with an initial upward velocity takes the same time to reach its peak and fall back down as an object dropped from rest, despite differing initial velocities. Some participants discuss energy conservation and the role of gravitational potential energy, while others explore the implications of Newton's equations of motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the concepts of energy conservation and the reversibility of motion. There is recognition of the complexities introduced by real-world factors like air resistance, and multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding the underlying physics principles, including the equations of motion and energy transformations, while also acknowledging the limitations of these models in practical scenarios.

mikeza
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A kangaroo jumps a height of 2.8m. How long was it in the air?

Homework Equations



v=v0+at

x=x0+v0t+(1/2)at^2

v^2=v0^2+2aΔx

The Attempt at a Solution



-2.8 = -4.9t^2
.57 = t^2
t = .76 s (down)

0 = v0^2+2(9.8)(2.8)
54.88 = v0^2
v0 = 7.408

0 = 7.408-9.8t
t = .76 (up)

t = 1.5 sec

SO...
I know I have the answer right I just don't understand how that works conceptually - that if something has a initial velocity upwards it takes the same time as if the initial velocity was 0 downwards. How can something traveling the same distance (just one negative and one positive) with the same acceleration but different initial velocities take the same amount of time out to the 9th decimal??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The thing initially has some kinetic energy. As it moves up, that kinetic energy is converted into gravitational potential energy, and then as it comes back down it is converted back into kinetic energy. Since energy is conserved, it would make sense that the initial velocity before leaving the ground is the same as just before it touches back down.

It doesn't work that way in the real world though, what with air resistance doing negative work on the way up and the way down, among other things.
 
Thanks a bunch. Can't wait to teach my class tomorrow... my teacher doesn't tell us anything.
 
Excellent observation, though you are not the first to make it. In fact it is much discussed you will later find.

The equations you quote are applications of Newton's equations of motion. These are reversible, i.e. if you exactly reverse the direction of every particle is traveling giving it the same velocity but in the exact opposite direction it will retrace the exact path it came by. People talk of substituting -t for t in equations and the solution is sort of the same in both cases but with time reversed.

To a extent this happens and can be observed in reality - as you have just done really. The reason it does not work in practice is also much discussed, and is that if the situation is more than so much complicated, you cannot realize that reversal. That is if you drop a drop of ink into water, according to the equations (which we do not have to solve, it is just a general property they have) if you could get behind each ink particle and for that matter all the water molecules, and push them back so as each have exactly equal opposite velocity they were traveling in that instant, then they would retrace their motions in reverse, reconcentrate together into an ink drop which would come out of the water back into the dropper. But you can see the 'if you could' is not a reasonable expectation, which explains why you will never see this happen.

If you are starting science expect to hear more of this.
 
Last edited:
mikeza said:

Homework Statement



A kangaroo jumps a height of 2.8m. How long was it in the air?

Homework Equations



v=v0+at

x=x0+v0t+(1/2)at^2

v^2=v0^2+2aΔx

The Attempt at a Solution



-2.8 = -4.9t^2
.57 = t^2
t = .76 s (down)

0 = v0^2+2(9.8)(2.8)
54.88 = v0^2
v0 = 7.408

0 = 7.408-9.8t
t = .76 (up)

t = 1.5 sec

SO...
I know I have the answer right I just don't understand how that works conceptually - that if something has a initial velocity upwards it takes the same time as if the initial velocity was 0 downwards. How can something traveling the same distance (just one negative and one positive) with the same acceleration but different initial velocities take the same amount of time out to the 9th decimal??

It may have been deliberate, but the "give away" equation you did not list [or was not stated] is

x = (vo + vf)/2 x time.

On the way up, the object starts at some velocity and finishes with zero velocity, thus covering a certain distance on the way. The time was how ever long it takes to change your velocity from the original value to zero, while acceleration is g.
On the way down, it has to cover the same distance, under the influence of the same acceleration [g] so will start at velocity 0, and finally reach the same speed as it was projected at, but traveling down not up.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K