Why Does B(cm^3/mol) Change Sign with Temperature?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pentazoid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Molecules
pentazoid
Messages
142
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Think about forces between molecules, and explain why we might expect B(cm^3/mol) to be negative at low temperatures but positive at high temperatures.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Well at low temperatures the motion of particles are not as high as they would be at high temperatures, so there is less kinetic energy so wouldn't they attract each other and opposite charges attractive but the product of two different charges are negative. As the temperature increases, the kinetic energy increases and attrative intermolecular forces begin to break apart and therefore a repulsive forces arises between the particles. Therefore the charges of the particle either must be both positive or both negative , therefore the product of the charges of the two particles are positive.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think what you've said so far is fairly correct. This also ties in with the fact that attractive forces have a negative sign associated with them, and repulsive forces are positive by convention.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top