Why Does Copper Reflect More Light Than Lead?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sophieyeomans
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metals Reflection
sophieyeomans
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Having done an experiment measuring the intensity of light reflected from copper, lead, zinc and iron, i found that copper reflected the most light, then iron, then zinc, then lead.

Now i have to explain it and I don't really know how to !


The Attempt at a Solution



I was thinking perhaps something to do with the fact that each of the metal atoms has different structures, and so different allowed quantum energies with which to absorb and emit light, so that's why they are all different?

But then I'm measuring light intensity, and doesn't intensity relate to the number of photons emitted, not the energy of each photon??

I'm really confused!

And what about the fact that they are not single atoms, but a lattice, with freely moving electrons?

:confused: Please help me ! :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at the different metals. Is the light being scattered from their surfaces different colors? What does this say about the frequencies of scattering? Quantum states?

Now look at the standard dispersion equation which is:

n = 1+\frac {q_e^2}{2m \epsilon }\sum_k \frac {N_k} <br /> {\omega_k^2 - \omega^2 + i\gama_k \omega}

Now the what happens when the \omega_k of the metal approaches the \omega of the source light? Under what conditions does the absorption peaks? how about scattering peaks?

What affect does the i\gama_k \omega} electron damping factor have on the above questions? Why do you think that when the surface oxidizes (which sends the \omega_k all over the place) do we get a dull surface?

Also think about interference. How does that affect the scattering? Why do we get a lot of scattering at certain angles and not at others?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top