Why Does Doubling Occur in My Illuminance Calculation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter a b
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a calculation of illuminance from a spherical lamp using its luminance and geometry. The user initially arrives at an illuminance value of 50.27 lux, which is double the expected value of 25.13 lux provided in the book. The discrepancy arises because the given luminance is for the hemisphere facing downward, not the entire sphere. Therefore, the total luminance should be considered as twice the provided value to accurately calculate the illuminance. Understanding this distinction resolves the issue of the doubled result.
a b
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,
this question is about an exercise but I post it here because it is not homework, it is an exercise that I've done to learn by myself. I hope it is ok.
It is an exercise from Irodov book (exercise 5.12)
The exercise says:
A small spherical lamp, uniformly luminous with radius R= 6.0 cm is suspended at an height h of 3 metres above the floor;
The luminance of the lamp is L=2.0*10^4 cd/m2, indipendent of direction.
Find the illuminance of the floor directly below the lamp.

the solution that the book (and my teacher) gives is

I= \pi\frac{R^{2}}{h^{2}} L = 25.13\, \, lux


I tried to solve it in this way:
the symmetry of the problem gives us many advantages; we can obtain the total luminous flux of the lamp by multiplying the luminance by the total surface and by 2 pi steradians (half of the maximum solid angle, because i assume the sphere doesn't radiate inside itself)

F=L (2 \pi) (4 \pi R^{2} )= L (8 \pi^{^2} R^{2} )

then, to have the illuminance of the floor just below the lamp, we can divide the total flux by the area of the sphere having radius h:

I= L (8 \pi^{^2} R^{2} )/ (4 \pi h^{2})= 2 \pi L \frac{R^{2}}{h^2}=50.27\; lux

but as you can see it is exactly twice the solution given by the book.
I suppose i am wrong, but i cannot understand why. can you help please?
Thank you in advance, sorry for my english
 
Physics news on Phys.org
.Your formula is correct, but the reason why you get twice the results of the book is because the luminance you are given is already the one of the hemisphere facing downwards. The total luminance of the sphere should be twice that value.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top