Why Does Europe Seem Better Made, Better Tasting, and Better Looking?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tumor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Europe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around perceptions of Western Europe compared to the USA, particularly regarding quality of life, aesthetics, and cultural differences. Many participants express a belief that European products are better made and that the overall lifestyle, including food and social interactions, is superior. Concerns are raised about the state of American industry and the decline of high-paying jobs, with some fearing a loss of technological know-how. The conversation also touches on political and social issues, highlighting a preference for the more secular and less politically charged environment in Europe compared to the USA. Participants note that European cities often rank higher in livability, citing factors like public transport, healthcare, and cultural richness. The discussion concludes with a recognition of the diversity within Europe itself and a mixed appreciation for both regions, acknowledging that while the USA has advantages, many prefer the European way of life.
tumor
Messages
126
Reaction score
1
Do you have impression when traveling in western Europe that everything there is better made,better tasting and even women are better looking?
I often travel to Europe because my old folks are living there and each time on my way here I'm depressed.
Of course America is a beautifull country and nature here is stunning but all the rest -man made stuff looks like it was made comparing to Europe 10-15
years ago and it is made cheaply.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you have impression when traveling in western Europe that everything there is better made,better tasting and even women are better looking?
I can't make a comparison since I haven't visited the USA, but life in Europe is fine. I think that I wouldn't be very much comfortable in a country where there exist dead penalty, free possession of guns, and its president says that God is telling him to attack other countries
 
meteor said:
I can't make a comparison since I haven't visited the USA, but life in Europe is fine. I think that I wouldn't be very much comfortable in a country where there exist dead penalty, free possession of guns, and its president says that God is telling him to attack other countries
I can make a comparison since I have been to both Spain and the USA, but life in the US is fine. I think that I wouldn't be very much comfortable in a country where there exist a great possibility of being blown to 3 million little pieces while riding the train. But that's just me.
 
Whatever. We are going to win the Davis cup anyway
 
Ahh, the Brits said the same thing about the world cup :biggrin: I was on hoilday in London when their team lost. What other sports are popular in Europe. Do you have baseball over their? The world series have been pretty intense.
 
I have a friend that's lived in Germany for six years and he won't hesitate to tell you how much better it is there than here.
 
I don't want to whine and complain about life in USA/Canada, this is just my small observation upon visiting other countries.One more thing is kind of scary here, most of industry and high paying jobs in USA are vanishing with this goes our technological know-how.
Results of this we can see around us, soon America won't be able to make decently reliable automobile.Jobs left going to be in McDonalds, WAL-MARTS and maybe making tanks/guns.
 
and that's why i own a Mercedes, longest lasting car EVER... nuff said
 
Do you have baseball over their?

baseball and football have not really stranded here.

I don't want to whine and complain about life in USA/Canada, this is just my small observation upon visiting other countries.One more thing is kind of scary here, most of industry and high paying jobs in USA are vanishing with this goes our technological know-how.

Its similar in Europe, industry jobs are taking a downhill.
 
  • #10
deltabourne said:
I can make a comparison since I have been to both Spain and the USA, but life in the US is fine. I think that I wouldn't be very much comfortable in a country where there exist a great possibility of being blown to 3 million little pieces while riding the train. But that's just me.

Before I hand you the prize for the most idiotic statement on PF, tell me you weren't being serious. Umm, 9/11, Oklahoma City?

I've been to Western Europe and the USA, and one of the things I like about Western Europe is that there are very few religious fundamentalists there, especially in positions of political power; certainly far less than there are in the USA. Lots of people in Western Europe believe in God, and follow some religion, but they tend to keep it to themselves, leave it a private matter. They don't bring it to their workplaces, or schools, or courts, or parliaments. At least nowhere near the extent to which this happens in the USA. The extent to which religion influences a person's vote in Western Europe is far less than it is in the USA. You will never get an openly atheist person voted as president of the USA. Never. And probably never a woman, too.

Public and cultural and political discourse in Western Europe is more sophisticated that it is in the USA. They also have a saner attitude to work. Politically, they are less conservative then the USA, but when the conservatives do get into power in Western Europe, they don't obsess themselves with stupid issues like abortion, abstinence, gay marriage, and affirmative action ... instead, they do what conservatives are supposed to do, like balance the budget, lower taxes responsibly without increasing spending, reform the welfare and health care systems rather than destroying them, and so on. And both sides of politics recognise the need for environmental protections and regulations.

But one of the things I most like about Western Europe is the people, the everyday people in the street. When you tell them where you are from, they nod their heads in recognition, and then ask you further questions which reveal that they know quite a bit about where you come from. They take an interest in the world, they have a genuine interest in things outside their own culture. For them, the UN is not a dirty word. Global organisations and cooperation do not leave a bad taste in their mouths. Foreign aid is not something to protest about. History is not something to ignore. Sex can be discussed in a mature way, the kids are not taught be ashamed of it. Drug addiction is thought to be a medical problem, not a criminal problem.

There are many things I like about the USA. They have a "can-do" attitude. They support universities and fundamental research a lot more than Western Europe. They are outwardly friendly, which can be a good thing for tourists. They have a generous immigration policy. They kicked out the Brits and thus became truly independent (err, Australia, New Zealand, are you listening?) The USA was the scene of many great progressive movements, such as the suffragette movement, and the civil rights movement. They tend to be less cynical than Western Europeans.

Overall, I prefer Western Europe to the USA, but there are things to like about both regions.
 
  • #11
and i find myself in a country dead center, right-in-the-middle of them both, and i prefer it that way
 
  • #12
Hello folks. Here is my first post in this forum, and I have one word for you:

Yogurt.
 
  • #13
Vector Sum said:
Yogurt.

Yes! What's the deal with that? Why is good yogurt impossible in this country?

And

Why can't we have Irn Bru? (Scotland's other national drink)
 
  • #14
Chi Meson said:
Yes! What's the deal with that? Why is good yogurt impossible in this country?

And

Why can't we have Irn Bru? (Scotland's other national drink)

Reminds me of this comedian and this bit he does about his trip to Ireland.

"Try the house beer-- it's freeeekinn grrrrrrreat!"

The german lagers are tasty- vote for best beer in europe?
 
  • #15
Remember, when traveling in Europe, you usually don't stop to see the dirty and dangerous places. When you travel to America, most people go directly to the dirtiest and most dangerous cities ( or they go to the Grand Canyon etc.). If Europeans came over to visit Boulder , or Portland (either one), or Mizzoula, they would get a much better impression of America than they would in NY, DC, LA, or Orlando.
 
  • #16
Vector Sum said:
Remember, when traveling in Europe, you usually don't stop to see the dirty and dangerous places. When you travel to America, most people go directly to the dirtiest and most dangerous cities ( or they go to the Grand Canyon etc.). If Europeans came over to visit Boulder , or Portland (either one), or Mizzoula, they would get a much better impression of America than they would in NY, DC, LA, or Orlando.


Maybe you right,but a person entering some run down part of Lyon,Stockholm, Antwerp or Hamburg can be sure to get out alive and unmolested unlike getting lost in New York or Miami.
 
  • #17
Vector Sum said:
Remember, when traveling in Europe, you usually don't stop to see the dirty and dangerous places. When you travel to America, most people go directly to the dirtiest and most dangerous cities ( or they go to the Grand Canyon etc.). If Europeans came over to visit Boulder , or Portland (either one), or Mizzoula, they would get a much better impression of America than they would in NY, DC, LA, or Orlando.


Remember there are good and bad parts to every city in the world
 
  • #18
deltabourne said:
I can make a comparison since I have been to both Spain and the USA, but life in the US is fine. I think that I wouldn't be very much comfortable in a country where there exist a great possibility of being blown to 3 million little pieces while riding the train. But that's just me.
After all, that's a toll we have to pay in order to have been USA's allied.

Well, this is my opinion to the original question of TUMOR. I've not been to USA, but I think, I believe, I have the impression that USA's people and culture is something opposite. This is the image you show to Europe through your films. I mean culture as historical culture. You are the most powerful country at sciences in all the world. But your historical background is very short. So that, people who eventually travel to Europe, to countries like Great Britain, Germany, France, Italy, or Spain, maybe see a bit more of monuments, big constructions, museums, and eat better food, drink better wine, and have another life style more quiet. The difference is here there are traditions, historical traditions. There, because you have a relatively short history, it seems you are a bit needed of traditions and self-personality.

It is not a critic of USA life. You must know there are several different ways of life here in Europe, although we belong to the same continent. Spain is very different of Germany, France, or GB. Last times, we have a similar illness: we run away from our proper personality.

Nevertheless, I would go to USA happily to work at a scientific job. You're the most developed industrial country in the world.
 
  • #19
Well, I've spent some time on both sides of the Atlantic, and I have to say that my heart will always be in Europe.

The thing is, there really isn't a "Europe". It's an incredibly varied continent. Even single countries, like France, Spain or Germany, have more cultural diversity in them than the US. The US has always seemed more "monolitic" to me, west coast, east coast, sout, midwest, ... There are differences but they are not so pronounced. To give you an example, I live in a country the size of Maryland, population ten million, and we speak three different languages :smile:

I've always enjoyed visiting the States. In many ways, the US had advantages over Europe. But I know in my heart that some of the disadvantages (if only the food and lack of decent beer and wine!) are too much for me to get used to. I might enjoy living there for a while, probably in New England or the north-west coast, but not the rest of my life.
 
  • #20
That was pretty funny, I don't want to live in a country where God is telling my president to attack other countries either. This isn't literally the case, but it also isn't far from the truth. He attacked Iraq because he wanted to, and it was his religious appeal that gave him the power to do it.
 
  • #21
""Do you have impression when traveling in western Europe that everything there is better made,better tasting and even women are better looking?""

Come to Spain, then you will change "western" to "south" :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #22
Dear Clausius2 I don't think we have paid NOTHING at March 11th. Terrorists attacked us not because of our alliance, not because Irak as well. I can't figure a reason to kill 191 persons which sin was LIVING. You know well that eta don't need any reason to kill a policemen or to kill a civil. Thats the same.

deltabourne said:
I can make a comparison since I have been to both Spain and the USA, but life in the US is fine. I think that I wouldn't be very much comfortable in a country where there exist a great possibility of being blown to 3 million little pieces while riding the train. But that's just me.

I realize that mother nature something experiments. This is a good example.

Spain has a good advantage, you can come here and if you get ill, you will receive medical attention. But we haven't discovered yet how to make a brain transplant, so keep searching.
 
  • #23
MiGUi said:
Come to Spain, then you will change "western" to "south" :smile:

I don't agree. South of Spain hasn't got a better way of life than the north. Or do you mean South has better way of life because they work less (they have the higher figures in unemployment of Spain) and take home more money after all? It's an strange effect.

I advice the potential travelers to go to north zones of Spain. I'm very bored all people around us only know about us because of "Flamenco" and "Sevillanas". The 99.9999% of Spain has nothing to do with it.

I didn't vote to Zapatero in the last elections (it's an important clarification). But you should realize if we hadn't been allied of USA in Iraq, maybe the probabilities of suffering a bombing had been lower. But in part you're right because in the deep of my thinkings I think a group of criminals of Morocco revenged the older conflicts between Spain and them, and maybe it has nothing to do with Iraq's War.
 
  • #24
Spanish women are some of the hottest in the world.
Clausius2,MiGUi,do you know any available girls?, I"m more than ready to hook up with one :-p
 
  • #25
tumor said:
Spanish women are some of the hottest in the world.
Clausius2,MiGUi,do you know any available girls?, I"m more than ready to hook up with one :-p

Yeah, I know some. But they are my personal treasure :rolleyes: . Anyway, I'm more ready than you, and I usually haven't got success with them. They are pretty... and a mistery when you try to undertand what the hell they want.
 
  • #26
And you have to know also that I've got 387 posts in my count because of I haven't got any success recently. :smile: :redface: :frown: :cry: If I would got it, I will spent all day with her f...ing. :smile: and I'd never come over here to write about phyisics. :smile:
 
  • #27
Clausius2 said:
...and a mistery when you try to undertand what the hell they want.


Mystery is solved my dear; MONEY.MONEY,MONEY. :wink:
 
  • #28
tumor said:
Mystery is solved my dear; MONEY.MONEY,MONEY. :wink:

Yes, you DO are right. So imagine: I'm merely and student, with no job, without money...I'm a disaster.

But...

I'VE GOT THE POWER OF THE WISDOM :smile:

(Although you haven't got any chance with womans when you start to talk about physics).
 
  • #29
Knowledge is everything,but you have to use it wisely,plus you are young.
I guarantee in few years women will be attracted to you like flies to the meat :wink:
Once I saw on Discovery program about some preety sofisticated experiments made by high school students,and there was a girl,geek very beautyfull, stunning,making some DNA school project, she also had some slight speach impendment that made her even more hot. Very smart, beautyfull, Man I'm telling you I was in love in a nano second.
 
  • #30
Dimitri Terryn said:
Well, I've spent some time on both sides of the Atlantic, and I have to say that my heart will always be in Europe.

The thing is, there really isn't a "Europe". It's an incredibly varied continent. Even single countries, like France, Spain or Germany, have more cultural diversity in them than the US. The US has always seemed more "monolitic" to me, west coast, east coast, sout, midwest, ... There are differences but they are not so pronounced. To give you an example, I live in a country the size of Maryland, population ten million, and we speak three different languages :smile:

I've always enjoyed visiting the States. In many ways, the US had advantages over Europe. But I know in my heart that some of the disadvantages (if only the food and lack of decent beer and wine!) are too much for me to get used to. I might enjoy living there for a while, probably in New England or the north-west coast, but not the rest of my life.

I've been to Europe (The Netherlands, Belgium, France, Switzerland, and Germany) once and I can't WAIT to go back! Absolutely everything about it was awesome! Dimitri, you can stay with Ivan and I when you come to the Pacific Northwest. :biggrin: UNLESS! - Shrub should win the election. Then I'm comin' to live with YOU! OK? Got a room I could rent? :biggrin: Is there a hospital with an xray department nearby so I don't have to walk the streets to pay my rent? :smile: :smile: :smile:
 
  • #31
:smile: if shrub wins the election :smile: :smile:

I can't wait to go back to europe either, Canada is so crappy these days, I'm probably going to move to Europe if the liberals keep winning.
 
  • #32
Do you have baseball over their?
Not very much, but i played in the baseball team of my school. I still guard the bat. Gosh, the ball is pretty heavy! It can make you darn injury if it falls right over your head
 
  • #33
Tsunami said:
I've been to Europe (The Netherlands, Belgium, France, Switzerland, and Germany) once and I can't WAIT to go back! Absolutely everything about it was awesome! Dimitri, you can stay with Ivan and I when you come to the Pacific Northwest. :biggrin: UNLESS! - Shrub should win the election. Then I'm comin' to live with YOU! OK? Got a room I could rent? :biggrin: Is there a hospital with an xray department nearby so I don't have to walk the streets to pay my rent? :smile: :smile: :smile:

Deal. I've got a spare bedroom we never use, so you can crash there.
Enjoy Belgium, where the phrase "Damn those right-wing liberals !" is often used :biggrin:
 
  • #34
Dimitri Terryn said:
Deal. I've got a spare bedroom we never use, so you can crash there.
Enjoy Belgium, where the phrase "Damn those right-wing liberals !" is often used :biggrin:
:smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:
 
  • #35
Clausius2 said:
But you should realize if we hadn't been allied of USA in Iraq, maybe the probabilities of suffering a bombing had been lower. But in part you're right because in the deep of my thinkings I think a group of criminals of Morocco revenged the older conflicts between Spain and them, and maybe it has nothing to do with Iraq's War.

I think your second statement holds more water than your first.

One of the most sobering pieces of information to come out of the investigation of the March 11th bombings is that the planning for the attacks may have begun nearly a year before 9/11. In October, 2000, several of the suspects met in Istanbul with Amer Azizi, who had taken the nom de guerre Othman Al Andalusi—Othman of Al Andalus. Azizi later gave the conspirators permission to act in the name of Al Qaeda, although it is unclear whether he authorized money or other assistance—or, indeed, whether Al Qaeda had much support to offer. In June, Italian police released a surveillance tape of one of the alleged planners of the train bombings, an Egyptian housepainter named Rabei Osman Sayed Ahmed, who said that the operation “took me two and a half years.” Ahmed had served as an explosives expert in the Egyptian Army. It appears that some kind of attack would have happened even if Spain had not joined the Coalition—or if the invasion of Iraq had never occurred.
 
  • #36
Gokul43201 said:
I think your second statement holds more water than your first.

I've read your information you posted below. I'm furious (not with you). All of us believe in that information, at least the part who didn't vote to Zapatero last elections. The problem here is: it cannot be said! Instantaneusly you are called racist! Recently, two years ago, we have a conflict with Morocco, because they invaded a small island near the shore of Morocco. The spanish government (presided by Aznar) decided to send the army in a secret and surprising mission to defeat and release the island, which was property of Spain. I think that some morocco people could have been disturbed by the event, plus they hate spanish because of the Reconquering of the peninsula by the cristians in ancient ages.

The problem is I really don't know why USA have such a good relations with Morocco, knowing the 90% of the terrorists of the 11 March came from Morocco, and probably the secret intelligent of that country was involved in some horrible way in the bombing. Why?. We supported you in Iraq's War, why do you have a preferential alliance with them instead of with us?.
 
  • #37
That's easy : if the US wishes to establish military bases in North Africa (in countries like Morocco or Tunisia, which can be "bought") this would be possible only if there is a good relationship with these countries.
 
Last edited:
  • #38
plus they hate spanish because of the Reconquering of the peninsula by the cristians in ancient ages.
And it's these very types of feelings, felt by peoples all over the globe, that will ultimately prevent us from ever experiencing true world peace. Too sad. :frown:
 
  • #39
To be fair America does have a higher standard of living than Europe. And the phrase "live large" applies heavily in America. The average house in America is over 3 times bigger than the average European house. Latest statistics show the typical America house at over 2,300 square feet. With the typical European house at about 700 square feet. And it's not just houses. Everything from roads, to cars, drinks, hamburgers, coffee, is bigger in America.

I disagree with the statement "Europe looks better". I find America to look far more modernized while Europe has more of the classic look. Nothing wrong with the classic look but I prefer the much more modern look.
 
  • #40
CloakNight said:
To be fair America does have a higher standard of living than Europe.

By what measure? It really depends on what your measuring stick is. In this list of most livable cities in the world, there is only 1 US city in the top 30 (Honolulu, 21st) compared to 16 European cities. There are 5 Australian cities, 4 Canadian cities, 2 New Zealand cities, and 2 Japanese cities, in the top 30. That's an embarrassing performance by the richest and most powerful country in the world. This is typical of so-called most livable lists. The USA rules in quantity, but it suffers in quality.

And the phrase "live large" applies heavily in America. The average house in America is over 3 times bigger than the average European house. Latest statistics show the typical America house at over 2,300 square feet. With the typical European house at about 700 square feet. And it's not just houses. Everything from roads, to cars, drinks, hamburgers, coffee, is bigger in America.

Yes, this illustrates my point. Quantity is everything in America.

Nothing wrong with the classic look but I prefer the much more modern look.

Fair enough.
 
  • #41
Dimitri Terryn said:
Deal. I've got a spare bedroom we never use, so you can crash there.
Enjoy Belgium, where the phrase "Damn those right-wing liberals !" is often used :biggrin:

Can I also come? I bring some beer OK? and I can sleep in the basement, no problem :smile:
 
  • #42
cragwolf said:
By what measure? It really depends on what your measuring stick is.
In that the average American has more money and spending power than the average European.

In this list of most livable cities in the world, there is only 1 US city in the top 30 (Honolulu, 21st) compared to 16 European cities. There are 5 Australian cities, 4 Canadian cities, 2 New Zealand cities, and 2 Japanese cities, in the top 30.
I don't know what the criterias were for "livable cities" but by standard of living I was speaking in terms of money.

Yes, this illustrates my point. Quantity is everything in America.
So you're suggesting that the average American house is inferior in quality to the average European house? I do not think many analysts will agree with that. Unless you can explain in what aspect would European houses be superior.
 
  • #43
CloakNight said:
I disagree with the statement "Europe looks better". I find America to look far more modernized while Europe has more of the classic look. Nothing wrong with the classic look but I prefer the much more modern look.

Europe looks better in the sense of quality of products they make from light bulb to the passenger jets.
I'm always blown away by the awesome trains in France or Germany,those are some of the most obvious examples of excellent workmanship.Some other examples are, public transport systems, incredible highways(autobahns)...well everything.Easthetically Europe beats USA/Canada hands down no question about it.
On the other hand Europeans earn less,pay higher taxes,don't own homes like people in the USA do etc.
But I would choose European system anyway,little bit of socialism does not hurt.
USA is too wild and heartless for average shmock.
 
  • #44
cragwolf said:
In this list of most livable cities in the world, there is only 1 US city in the top 30 (Honolulu, 21st) compared to 16 European cities. There are 5 Australian cities, 4 Canadian cities, 2 New Zealand cities, and 2 Japanese cities, in the top 30.
Alright I just looked at the list. There is only 1 US city in the top 30? What is Boston doing at #28? 11 of the top 40 seems to be in America.

Also Vancouver is ranked first? Now I know this list has no credibility. Vancouver, as decent of a city it is, is just a dumbed down version of Seattle. Visit Seattle and visit Vancouver and tell me what you honestly view as the better city.

Not to mention the ranking of American cities are so fiddled up. Honolulu, Boston, Atlanta, Chicago, Lexington, Miami are the most "livable" cities in America? We really need to define "livable" here.
 
Last edited:
  • #45
cragwolf said:
By what measure? It really depends on what your measuring stick is. In this list of most livable cities in the world, there is only 1 US city in the top 30 (Honolulu, 21st) compared to 16 European cities. There are 5 Australian cities, 4 Canadian cities, 2 New Zealand cities, and 2 Japanese cities, in the top 30. That's an embarrassing performance by the richest and most powerful country in the world. This is typical of so-called most livable lists. The USA rules in quantity, but it suffers in quality.

Exactly. What measuring stick? THis is a list of British expatriates preferred cities. Cities within the British Commonwealth will get preference because they don't need special visas. New Zealand, Austrailia and Canada are the easiest countries for British subjects to move to. THey speak the same language and they can "just go"!

This is by no means a final say in any kind of ranking for cities. THere is NO way that Honolulu is "more livable " than Portland OR. I've spent time in both. BUt British folks are moving away from overcast skys, not toward them!
 
  • #46
  • #47
CloakNight said:
So you're suggesting that the average American house is inferior in quality to the average European house?

No, I don't think I've ever mentioned the word "house". I was merely commenting on your focus on what is bigger.

There is only 1 US city in the top 30? What is Boston doing at #28?

Yes, but there are 4 cities tied at 28, and Boston is listed at the bottom of those 4, so I mistakenly assumed that it was at 31. Doesn't really change the picture much. 2 of the top 31 are US cities.

cragwolf seemed to have failed to mention this.

I assume you forgot a "you" between "cragwolf" and "seemed", because I wouldn't expect you to be rude and start talking about me in the third person. :wink:

"Melbourne and Vancouver are the best cities in the world for expatriates to live in, according to a survey by the Economist Intelligence Unit."

Yes. So? Alright, so you give no credence to the preferences of a group of people who have left Britain. No problem. There are other lists. Let me get a list compiled by an American company, Mercer HRC, just in case you're worried about anti-American bias. The link to the list is below, but you'll need to register (free) to view it:

http://www.mercerhr.com/knowledgecenter/reportsummary.jhtml?idContent=1128060

The story is much the same. There are only 2 US cities in the top 31 of this list, Honolulu and San Francisco. There are 17 European cities, 5 Canadian cities, 5 Australian cities, and 2 New Zealand cities. The US cities tend to come in around positions 40 to 50.

Of course, all of these "most livable" lists contain a mixture of objective and subjective elements, and how they're brought together will involve a mixture of objective and subjective techniques. That is obviously unavoidable. But the fact is that there is a clear trend in these lists which sees European cities consistently rated as more livable than US cities. Which is quite relevant to this thread.

One final point: if you base your opinion of the credence of these lists in your personal preferences of cities, then you are not thinking very clearly. It's like saying, "This list of most popular films has no credence because obviously The Godfather was a better film than Return of the King!" Learn what a survey is before making silly comments like those.
 
  • #48
cragwolf said:
One final point: if you base your opinion of the credence of these lists in your personal preferences of cities, then you are not thinking very clearly. It's like saying, "This list of most popular films has no credence because obviously The Godfather was a better film than Return of the King!" Learn what a survey is before making silly comments like those.

Oh, get a joke! :smile:
You MIGHT be referring to my last post. IF you are, I assure you I understand surveys. I know that you can get a survey that is not very useful by selecting only specific groups. An analysis of answers can lead to speculation about why certain results have shown up. Follow-up surveys can bear out these speculations.

Simply from personal experience (I have a Scottish mother and half my extended family are British), I know that a huge number of Brits are tired of the dreary weather that perpetuates in those Isles. If they plan to move to America, for whatever reason, the last place they will consider (if they have the option) is another place famous for its dreary weather. It was a bit of a joke. This thread has tinges of flame around it.
 
Last edited:
  • #49
Gokul43201 said:
That's easy : if the US wishes to establish military bases in North Africa (in countries like Morocco or Tunisia, which can be "bought") this would be possible only if there is a good relationship with these countries.

You should be shamed (you're american, aren't you?) of your government of having such alliances by military interests. USA is giving a bad impression abroad with it.
 
Back
Top