Why Does Expanding a Charged Spherical Shell Require Work?

  • Thread starter Thread starter harini_5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
AI Thread Summary
Expanding a charged spherical shell requires work due to the changing electric field during the expansion process. The work done by electric forces is calculated using the formula 1/(8πε) * Q^2(1/R - 1/H), which accounts for the energy stored in the spherical capacitor. The initial attempt incorrectly applied the potential energy change without integrating over the varying electric field. The correct approach involves recognizing that the energy stored in a capacitor is given by 1/2 * Q^2/C, where the capacity of a spherical conductor is 4πεR. Understanding these concepts clarifies the necessity of the additional factor of 1/2 in the calculations.
harini_5
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A spherical shell of radius R with uniform charge Q is expanded to a radius H.find the work done by electric forces during the shell expansion
given answer is 1/(8pi epsilon) *Q^2(1/R-1/H)
my attempt
work=-change in P E
=Q(V1-V2)
=1/(4pi epsilon) *Q^2(1/R-1/H)
please explain the additional 1/2 factor
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here you have to consider the energy stored in a spherical capacitor.
What is the capacity of a spherical conductor?
What is the energy stored in a capacitor?
 
what is the mistake in my approach?
why not take change in potential energy as work done?
 
harini_5 said:
what is the mistake in my approach?
why not take change in potential energy as work done?
Because the electric field in continuously changing during the expansion of the spherical conductor. To find the total work done you have to take the integration.
Energy stored in the capacitor= 1/2*Q^2/C
Capacity of the spherical conductor = 4πεοR
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top