Why does Gravity affects Light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 9Vibes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Light
AI Thread Summary
Gravity affects light because, although photons are massless, they possess energy, which according to special relativity, is equivalent to mass. This means that light can be influenced by gravitational fields despite having no rest mass. The bending of light is often explained using the analogy of gravity distorting space, where light travels along a straight path in curved spacetime, making it appear curved to observers. The concept of geodesics, which are the shortest paths in curved space, further explains how light follows these paths influenced by mass. Understanding these principles clarifies why light is affected by gravity, even without traditional mass.
9Vibes
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi all , its my first post here in PF.

Well basically , I have this really simple question (To you guys , but its hard for me).

Why does Gravity affects light?

In school , we are taught that gravity affects things that has mass. Now since light is composed of photons and since they are massless , how does gravity affects them?

Can anyone explains this to me? Try to give me a really simple answer , because I am not really a physics whizz ;)
 
Science news on Phys.org
Welcome at PF.

The simplest way of looking at it, is that light does not have mass, but it does have energy. For example, a photon with frequency f, has energy E = h f (with h Planck's constant, up to possible factors of 2 pi). Now according to special relativity, energy is equivalent with mass, so although photons do not have a rest mass, they have energy which gives them some - if you want - "effective" mass which can be affected by gravity.

If you want the more complicated answer, you need to invoke the analogy of gravity "bending" space while light always goes "straight", which makes it look to us like it's not. The famous (flawed, but for this purpose sufficient) analogy is of space like a rubber sheet and heavy objects making a dent in it. So in this image a photon would go "straight" along one of the black lines, for example - but to us it would appear as if it is being curved.

If you want the technically correct answer (which I suppose you don't, given your last sentence, but I think it's good to state it): a photon always follows a geodesic. The geodesics are defined by the metric on the space, which in turn depends on the mass content of the universe. If the metric is not flat but we are pretending it is, the geodesic will look curved.
Basically this the same as the "more complicated" answer above but without involving things like rubber sheets.
 
Last edited:
CompuChip said:
Welcome at PF.

The simplest way of looking at it, is that light does not have mass, but it does have energy. For example, a photon with frequency f, has energy E = h f (with h Planck's constant, up to possible factors of 2 pi). Now according to special relativity, energy is equivalent with mass, so although photons do not have a rest mass, they have energy which gives them some - if you want - "effective" mass which can be affected by gravity.

If you want the more complicated answer, you need to invoke the analogy of gravity "bending" space while light always goes "straight", which makes it look to us like it's not. The famous (flawed, but for this purpose sufficient) analogy is of space like a rubber sheet and heavy objects making a dent in it. So in this image a photon would go "straight" along one of the black lines, for example - but to us it would appear as if it is being curved.


@ Your first answer , what is the relationship between frequency and energy? Pi is that 3.142 thing.. ?


Does that means that light is going straight , but the path it is moving is not straight , but bent? So to us it appears to be curved? And was the path that the 'ball' take spacetime?

Sorry for asking these questions.. They don't teach these stuff in school.
 
Please read an entry in the FAQ thread. This has been addressed.

Zz.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top