Why Does Heat Stop Flowing When Q=TS in Thermal Equilibrium?

AI Thread Summary
Heat stops flowing when Q equals TS because, at this point, the system reaches thermal equilibrium with its surroundings. The relationship Q = TS is derived from the thermodynamic equation S = Q/T, indicating that entropy change is linked to heat transfer at a constant temperature. In reversible processes, the system and surroundings maintain equilibrium throughout, ensuring their temperatures align after heat exchange. The Helmholtz and Gibbs equations reinforce that equilibrium conditions must be satisfied for these thermodynamic relationships to hold. Ultimately, understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing spontaneous changes and energy transformations in thermodynamic systems.
zezima1
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Is defined as F = U - TS and it is the energy needed to create a system minus the heat it can get for free.

But why is the heat that it can get for free given by:
Q = TS

I know the thermodynamic relation:

S = Q/T

So in that way I understand it. But how do you know, that the system will be in thermal equilibrium with surroundings, when it has received a total energy of Q = TS as heat? I mean, the point where heat stops interesting is when temperaturs are equal, i.e. when dS/dU is the same for both systems. How do you know that holds when a total of heat of Q=TS has entered?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint :

This formula holds for reversible processes only.

Remember, entropy is defind as [dQ (reversible)/dT ].
 
hmm you got to help me more on this: Why do you know that the temperature of the system is equal to the surroundings after having received Q = TS
 
What happens during a reversible process?

How are the temperatures(or some other quantities like pressure) of system and surrounding related during each step in such a process?

(Hint: It has something to do with equilibrium.)
 
Last edited:
They are in equilibrium at all times. It's like a pile of sand on a piston of a cylinder with a gas, removing a tiny grain each time.
So should the two systems be in thermal equilibrium at all times? Well making a system out of nothing, how will the temperature then be the same as the environment?
 
Hey,

Equilibrium is of various types, like mechanical , thermal, chemical etc.

When we speak of it in general we mean all the above are satisfied meaning the two bodies are in thermal equilibrium as well.

in fact the Helmholtz and Gibbs equations are obtained for the conditios that The system and surrounding are in thermal equilibrium at all stages.


A more applicable and conveying form of the equation is dA=dU-TdS,

with dA<=0 for spontaneous change.
(we will later see why)


This equality holds only for reversible processes and the Clausius inequality sets in for determining it for any process.


The interpretation you make on why the temperatures become equal after Q=TdS is exchanged is unheard of , by me and (unless it was stated in your textbook where the author maybe conveying something else) I think it's wrong.

As i said The system and surrounding are in thermal equilibrium at all stages, and the process stops when WE WISH to end the infinitely small difference between driving and opposing force


-----

Take the interpretation of Helmholtz energy as this.

dA=dU-TdS,


Here, dS is entropy change of the system and -dU/T is the entropy change of surroundings (since system has a constant volume, use first law).

For a spontaneous change this total entropy change of universe(system + surrounding) should be positive and the total should tend to maximum.

So Using Clausius inequality we need to have dA <0 for a spontaneous change.


Of all models available this IMHO is the best possible interpretation.
-------


Also As mentioned this is obtained for the system and surrounding in thermal equilibrium.

If that's not the case then,
Since dA is a state function, we can create an equivalent reversible process to account for dS of system which will be same for both processes as S is a state function.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top