Why Does Iron Mark the Limit for Energy-Producing Fusion in Stars?

ay2k
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
The buildup of heavier elements in the nuclear fusion processes in stars is limited to elements below iron, since the fusion of iron would subtract energy rather than provide it



The fusion of two nuclei lighter than iron generally releases energy while the fusion of nuclei heavier than iron absorbs energy; vice-versa for the reverse process, nuclear fission.

These two statements semm contradictory. Which one is actually correct? If both are actually correct, can someone please explain that what is the point that I am missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are not contradictory. The basic idea is that ratio of atomic mass to number of nucleons is at the minimum for iron.

The point is that fusion of elements lighter than iron releases energy, while fission of elements heavier than iron releases energy. For iron both processes require energy input.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
Back
Top