Why does light take a longer path in a rarer medium?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fiona Rozario
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Medium Path
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of light as it transitions between optically denser and rarer media, specifically examining why light appears to take a longer path in a rarer medium despite its increased speed. The conversation touches on principles of optics, including Fermat's principle of least time, and explores various analogies and interpretations related to this phenomenon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that when light enters an optically denser medium, it bends towards the normal due to a reduction in speed, following the principle of least time.
  • Others question why this principle does not seem to apply when light moves into a rarer medium, suggesting that if light takes a shorter path, it should result in less time taken.
  • One participant draws an analogy to driving routes, suggesting that the fastest route may not always be the shortest distance.
  • Another participant discusses the concept of light being emitted in all directions and only certain paths contributing to the overall travel time based on constructive interference.
  • There is mention of Fermat's principle and its application in both media, with a suggestion that the quickest path remains consistent even when the direction of light is reversed.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the classical explanations and whether they hold in more advanced physics contexts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the application of Fermat's principle and the behavior of light in different media. There is no clear consensus, as some participants support the classical interpretations while others raise questions and propose alternative understandings.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of the principle of least time, the nature of light paths, and the implications of interference patterns. Participants acknowledge the complexity of the topic without resolving these issues.

Fiona Rozario
Messages
52
Reaction score
1
When traveling into an optically denser medium, the speed of light reduces and as per the principle of least time, light bends towards the normal and takes the shortest path.

But why isn't this followed when light passes into a rarer medium? With its speed increased in the rarer medium, if it takes a shorter path, time will be lesser than the path taken (by bending away from the normal).
 
Science news on Phys.org
Surely you are familiar with this effect. If you wish to go to a nearby city sometimes the shortest route is all on surface streets but the fastest overall route involves driving a little out of your way to use the freeway.
 
Fiona Rozario said:
When traveling into an optically denser medium, the speed of light reduces and as per the principle of least time, light bends towards the normal and takes the shortest path.

Note that you're after the shortest total time across the entire path.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
etotheipi said:
Note that you're after the shortest total time across the entire path.
Yebbut how does it know which way to go when it's setting off? :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
sophiecentaur said:
Yebbut how does it know which way to go when it's setting off? :wink:

Well if it goes the wrong way then it's not going to get to B anyway :frown:. If light is emitted radially from A in all possible directions, the only light that reaches B will be that which is emitted along our calculated path.

But I suspect you already know this, so now I worry I have missed something. So I will preface this with "at least that's what happens classically, I have no idea if this holds up in more advanced Physics :wink:".
 
I thought it went all ways, but only the paths very close to Fermats route interfered constructively: the sum of all the other paths interfere destructively.
I know that's very vague and arm waving, but I did pinch it from a real physicist.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and etotheipi
etotheipi said:
so now I worry I have missed something.
Nah - I was just being cheeky!
@Merlin3189 's post make sense. And he's not muckin' you about. :smile:

But that question of mine was typical of the sort of question that used to be asked in the past.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Merlin3189 and etotheipi
No that's very cool, I didn't know that. I had a look at the very last section here:

https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/I_26.html

where he describes the process of summing the phasors for each path together. Close paths only differ beyond first order (I suppose because we're at a minimum of the curve) and will add together nicely, and phasors rotated either side of the average will generally cancel.

Please do correct me if I've made a mistake :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
Fiona Rozario said:
Summary:: Is Fermat's principle of least time applied when light travels from an optically denser to a rarer medium?
Yes, least time refers to the total time in both media.

Fiona Rozario said:
When traveling into an optically denser medium, the speed of light reduces and as per the principle of least time, light bends towards the normal and takes the shortest path.

But why isn't this followed when light passes into a rarer medium? With its speed increased in the rarer medium, if it takes a shorter path, time will be lesser than the path taken (by bending away from the normal).
Swapping the media is the same as reversing the direction of the light. And if it's the quickest path in one direction, then it's also the quickest path if you reverse the direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi and sophiecentaur
  • #10
Thank you, everyone!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
Replies
15
Views
2K