Why Does Methylamine Deprotonation Result in a Negative Charge on Nitrogen?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bomba923
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
When methylamine (CH3NH2) loses a proton, it forms CH3NH, which has a negative charge on the nitrogen atom, rather than CH2=NH2, which would have a positive charge on nitrogen. This phenomenon can be attributed to the stability of the resulting species and the concept of intramolecular proton transfer. The discussion highlights that the conjugate anion formed (CH3NH) is a stronger base than the amine hydrogen, making it less favorable for the intramolecular reaction to occur. The preference for nitrogen to bear the negative charge is also explained through electronegativity considerations, indicating that nitrogen is more capable of stabilizing a negative charge compared to carbon.
bomba923
Messages
759
Reaction score
0
Why is it that when methylamine (CH_3 NH_2) loses a proton,

you get CH_3 NH (with a negative charge on nitrogen) rather than CH_2 = NH_2 (with a positive charge on nitrogen) ?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
So you're basically saying that an intramolecular proton transfer will occur, either that or you're basically asking on why the carbon hydrogen in less acidic then the one on the amine. If it is in reference to the latter...read you text. The intramolecular reaction does not occur appreciably (to my knowledge) because the conjugate anion is a stronger base than even the amine hydrogen.
 
Think in terms of electronegativity. Which atom is more likely to bear a negative charge?
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top