Why Does My Copper-Zinc System Show Unexpected EMF and Precipitation Results?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ngkamsengpeter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrochemistry
AI Thread Summary
The experiment on the copper-zinc system revealed unexpected EMF and precipitation results, with the galvanometer showing minimal current despite adjustments. The voltmeter indicated only 0.5V, significantly lower than the calculated 1.1V, raising questions about the experimental setup. The solution used was 2.0 mol/dm3 copper(II) sulfate and 1.0 mol/dm3 zinc(II) sulfate. Precipitation of a black solid on the zinc plate suggests alternative reactions may be occurring, potentially forming compounds like CuS or Cu2O. Understanding the anodic and cathodic reactions involved is crucial for resolving these discrepancies.
ngkamsengpeter
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
I conduct an experiment to find the emf of the copper-zinc system . I connect the copper to the positive
terminal of the batery and a potentiometer and the zinc plate to the galvanometer.The galvanometer is connected
to a jockey . The battery I use is 3V .I touch the jockey to the potentiometer so that the galvanometer show
no current but suprisingly , no matter where I move the jockey , the galvanometer show only a litte change(smaller
than the smallest scale of the galvanometer) . Is it true ?

I also try to connect a voltmeter across the copper-zinc system to check the emf of the system . The voltmeter show
only about 0.5V but from the calculation it should be around 1.1 V . What wrong with my experiment .

The solution I use is 2.0 mol/dm3 copper(II) sulphate and 1.0 mol/dm3 zinc(II) sulphate .

Because of unsuccessful conducting the experiment , I tried to dip the zinc plate to the copper(II)sulphate with the
copper plate still inside the copper(II) sulphate . Something black solid precipitates at the zinc plate . What is
this solid .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please write the anodic and cathodic reactions one would expect.

Usually, if one does not get the expected voltage, it can mean that another reaction is taking place.

Something black could be CuS or Cu2O.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
5K
Back
Top